My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV89108
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV89108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:05 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:48:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1998038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/20/2000
Doc Name
ADEQUACY REVIEW TR 1 TWO RIVERS PIT PN M-1998-038
From
DMG
To
KIRKLAND CONSTRUCTION RLLP
Type & Sequence
TR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • •; <br />STATE OF iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1317 Sherman 61., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />DIVISION O F <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX: (303)832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br />MI NING•SAFETY <br />April 20, 2000 <br /> B~II Owens <br /> Governor <br /> Greg E. Walther <br /> Esecurive Director <br />Mr-James H. Kirkland Michael B. Long <br />Kirkland Construction, RLLP Division Director <br />P.O. Box 580 <br />Rye, CO 81069 <br /> <br />RE: Adequacy Review, Technical Revision No. 1, Two Rivers Pit, P ermit No. M-1998-038 <br />Deaz Mr. Kirkland: <br />The Division has completed its initial review of your proposed Technical Revision No. 1. We have an <br />adequacy issue with the proposal. Please satisfactorily address the following item prior to the May 10, <br />2000 decision due date. If you cannot address this issue prior to that date, you should request a <br />continuation of the decision to a later date to avoid denial of the revision. <br />Your Technical Revision No. 1 is not consistent with the approved mining plan. Your <br />approved plan is a phased mining operation, which would require that one phase be mined and <br />reclamation started prior to starting mining in the next phase. The 15 acres you propose to <br />mine under this revision is in parts of two phases, Phase l and 2. You must include as part of <br />this revision a restructuring of your phased mining plan. You should redraw the phase <br />boundazies. In this case you would probably want to add that portion of the 15 acres in Phase 2 <br />to Phase 1. You may want to add unmined Phase 1 acres to Phase 2 to keep the acreage in <br />balance, but this is not required. <br />If your response does not change the amount of acreage you want to add [o the present phase of <br />mining, your bond would be increased by a per acre amount. ($150,643 present bond amount divided <br />by 40 acres presently allowed disturbance area = $3,766.00 per acre.) <br />Please call me if you have questions, at (303) 866-4922. <br />Sincerely, <br />Larry D. Oehler <br />Environmental Protection Specialis[ <br />G c : ~ r=..,. Sf.~ vim-- f <br />AI bsalymmUempN1- I Y48-U!5 1 k ko mw ~ IJo.~ue <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.