Laserfiche WebLink
• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • <br />PARCEL, MAURO, HLTLTIN & SPAANSTRA, P. G. <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />SUITE 3600 <br />1601 CALIFORNIA STREET <br />DENVER. COLORADO 60202-2638 <br />TELEPHONE D031 292-6900 <br />O EAN R. MASSEY '~-TI1/ 1 / TELECOPIER 1303)295-3040 <br />1 ~ ' (l/~ <br />September 8, ~9~ <br />Dr. James Pendleton `S~P Q 8 X992 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology ("Division") DIVISIUiv ~,; <br />Department of Natural Resources (MINERALS & GEU~Ui;v <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />DIRECT DIAL <br />(303) 293-6509 <br />Re: Battle Mountain Resources ("BMR",) -San Luis Project <br />Permit No. M-88-112 <br />Response to the Division's Comments on BMR's Adequacy Responses to <br />Technical Revision No. 006 <br />Dear Dr. Pendleton: <br />Enclosed with this letter you will find three copies of BMR's responst; to the above- <br />referenced adequacy comments on Technical Revision No. 006. BMR's response to the <br />Division's additional adequacy comments is submitted in compliance with Abatement <br />Requirement No. 12 which was imposed pursuant to the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Board's May 28, 1992 Order. BMR believes that the enclosed responses address all of the <br />additional comments provided to BMR by the Division on June 30, 1992. B9~1R intends to <br />commence the procedures set forth in the sampling and analytical protocol Upon receipt of <br />final approval from your office. <br />You will note that the enclosed document includes responses which deflect the fact <br />that your office has selected RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc. and Core Labor;~tories as the <br />independent sampling and analytical contractor respectively. BMR understands that your <br />decision in this regard is made in the context of this technical revision ("TR.006") and has <br />forwarded a copy of the Agreement for Environmental Consulting Services, Scope of Work <br />and Memorandum of Understanding as approved in your letter of August 27 to Anne Maest <br />for review. We hope to conduct any necessary discussions regarding the coptract as soon <br />as possible. As you know, TR-006 is an attachment to the contract and we will require a <br />final decision prior to execution of the contract with RCG/Hagler, Bailly, Inc. We will <br />contact you next week to ensure coordination between the review and approval process for <br />TR-006 and the contract discussions. We remain committed to resolving any remaining <br />issues and obtaining final approval and implementation as soon as possible. Please don't <br />