My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37933
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37933
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:49:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/6/1997
Doc Name
NOV C-97-018 RECEIVED BY ENERGY FUELS MINING CO ON OCT 20 1997 PN C-82-055
From
ENERGY FUELS MINING CO
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1997018
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ii- ~~iiii~iiiiu iii <br />energy fuels mining company <br />GG c ~~ Go,~„a.~ <br />v.o. box 459 <br />1lorence, Colorado 81226 <br />October 29, 1997 <br />(7191 784-6395 <br />fax (719) 784.4352 <br />RECEIVED <br />NOV 0 6 1991 <br />Mr. Michael B. Long, Director Division ofMineraisKGeorogy <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Notice of Violation No.C-97-018 received by Energy Fuels <br />Mining Company on October 20, 1997; Permit No. C-82-055 <br />Information About the Violation, and <br />Request to Vacate the Violation <br />Dear Mr. Long: <br />Energy Fuels Mining Company (EFMC) believes that the cited <br />conditions are not in violation of the Rules or permit conditions, <br />and therefore the Notice of Violation should be vacated. The <br />violation alleges failure .to submit to the Division an Annual <br />Reclamation Report for 1996, and failure to complete Year 2 <br />vegetation monitoring as required by the permit. <br />The facts supporting EFMC's request to vacate the violation, <br />referencing both items mentioned in the violation, are explained <br />below in detail. <br />1. Failure to submit the 1996 Annual Reclamation Report <br />Submittal of the Annual Reclamation Report was an administrative <br />oversight by EFMC. The DMG discussed submittal of the report during <br />a telephone conversation with EFMC the week of October 6. EFMC <br />compiled the report on October 10, then mailed the report to the <br />Division on October 15. <br />Although submittal of the Annual Reclamation Report was past the <br />deadline set forth in Rules, EFMC did not intentionally withhold <br />information from the Division that might be used to evaluate the <br />progress of reclamation at the site. The only substantial <br />information presented in the report, which may also be found in the <br />DMG's inspection reports, is EFMC's documentation of reseeding <br />approximately 3 acres of the reclaimed mine site during 1996. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.