My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37269
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37269
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:19 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982121
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/22/1996
Doc Name
MID-CONTINENT QUARRY PERMIT M-82-121 REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION TO SUBMIT FINANCIAL WARRANTY AND
From
DMG
To
MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES INC
Violation No.
MV1992024
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources <br />111 1 Sherman SL, Room ? 1 S <br />Denver, Colorado 80201 <br />Phone ( 7031 R6h-35N7 <br />FA%:13031 832-8106 <br />i -111 Illllllllllll III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF' <br />NATURAL. <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames S Eechhead <br />b.ecutive Direcwr <br />August 22, 1996 <br />Ms. Diane Delaney <br />Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br />P. O. Box 1298 <br />Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 <br />mirhacl B. Long <br />orvision o~re~r~r <br />RE: Mid-Continent Quarry, Permit M-82-121, Request for time <br />extension to submit Financial Warranty and consideration of <br />reasons to determine that a Reason to Believe a Violation <br />Exists is not justified. <br />Dear Ms. Delaney: <br />The Division has reviewed your letter of July 23, 1996, <br />requesting a time extension to submit additional financial <br />warranty for the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry. We have also <br />received and reviewed Robert Delaney's correspondence dated <br />August 16, 1996 stating the reasons why he believes that the <br />Division determination that a violation may exist is incorrect. <br />After considering the outstanding issues, including the current <br />situation with the EPA regarding the possible hazardous waste <br />spill at the site and the negotiations between MC Resources and <br />BLM, the Division is extending the time to attempt to resolve the <br />financial warranty situation. Please note, however, the Division <br />does not consider the situation resolved and reserves its right <br />to ask the Mined Land Reclamation Board (NLRB) to consider <br />possible revocation of the permit and to take other appropriate <br />actions. We anticipate asking the NLRB to consider this issue at <br />their November 13-14, 1996 Meeting. <br />In response to Robert Delaney's August 16, 1996, letter, the <br />provision of the liquidation plan which refers to negotiation of <br />a reclamation schedule applies only to the coal mine site; it has <br />no application to the quarries. Section 4.3.4 refers to the <br />"reclamation plan." Reclamation plan is defined by the <br />liquidation plan as the plan for the coal mine site. <br />Consequently, reference to negotiation does not apply to the <br />quarries. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.