Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />BULL SEEP <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />JANUARY 7, 2002 1:00 PM <br />MINUTES <br />Attendance: (SEE ATTACHED LIST) <br />Location: Urban Drainage & Flood Control District Board Room <br />Time: I:00 PM <br />Date: Monday, January 7, 2002 <br />Meeting Minutes: <br />1. An attendance list was passed around. Bryan Kohlenberg (UD&FCD) and Craig <br />Jacobson (ICON Engineering) mentioned that comments on the Meeting Minutes <br />from December 19th been received and revised comments would be sent out via <br />email. <br />2. Jeff Schwarz (Massey Semenoff Schwarz & Bailey, P.C.) began by going over the <br />events that had taken place since December 19'h. He mentioned that Applegate had <br />developed bracketed scenarios for the spillway configurations. l5 different scenarios <br />were developed using crest elevations for the Bull Seep Slough Drop of 5023.0, <br />5024.0 and 5025.0. Manning's `n' values were also adjusted between 0.03 and 0.07. <br />The results from the analysis indicated that the entire 4800-cfs, First Creek 100-year <br />discharge. could not successfully be conveyed through the existing Bull Seep Slough <br />alignment without major channeling that encroached significantly on the McIntosh <br />property and/or the Hazeltine Pit. According to Jeff, the successful conveyance of the <br />4800 cfs flow in this area was prevented by the elevations Ken McIntosh (McIntosh <br />Farms) had selected for the Bull Seep Slough area and the bank along the Hazeltine <br />Pit. As a result, Lafarge is proposing a new plan that removes the spillway, and only <br />conveys 250-cfs through the Bull Seep Slough. <br />3. Jeff Schwarz continued to add that the Gingery Report, developed in the 1970's <br />indicated that the water in the Howe Pit naturally wants to travel north towards the <br />Hazeltine Pit and a better location for the spillway may be located further to the East, <br />between the Howe pit and Hazeltine Pit. <br />4. Jeff Schwarz continued [o mention that Lafarge had met with Bryan Kohlenberg and <br />Ken McIntosh on January 3`d and 4'" respectively to get comments on the analysis <br />that was sent out by Applegate. Jeff finished by mentioning that Lafarge was under <br />orders to submit a revised drainage plan to the DMG by Friday, January ll'h. <br />According to Jeff, a general plan will be sufficient and does not need to include <br />engineering drawings and specifications. <br />5. Bryan Kohlenberg confirmed that members of the Task Force would be given an <br />opportunity to review the final construction details such as engineered drawings and <br />specifications prior to construction. Jeff Schwarz responded by stating that some <br />time would be provided, however, he hopes it will be kept to a minimum. <br />C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\I-7 meeting.doc <br />