My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE35520
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE35520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:45:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 2:39:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/6/1991
Doc Name
Ccomments on TDN 91-2-116-4 TV3
From
PARCEL MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
To
MLRD
Violation No.
CV1991002
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. <br />PARCEL, 1•IliURO, HULTIN & <br />B RENT C. ANDERSON <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />sss <br />SPAANSTRA, Y.G. <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />SUITE ]!00 <br />ISOI GLIFORHIA STREET <br />O[NVER, COLORA00 G0202 <br />TELEPHONE 1]O]1 292-G~00 <br />TELCCOPIER I]O]I 295-]OAO <br />~'`1/-~ <br />~~~~~~ ~~ <br />DELIVERED HY MESSENGER <br />May 6, 1991 <br />Mr. Steve Renner <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />MAY 61991 <br />Mined Land <br />Reclamation Division <br />Re: The Rockcastle Company, Grassy Gap Mine (Permit No. <br />C-81-039) -- Comments on Office of Surface Mining, <br />Reclamation and Enforcement ("OSM") Ten-Day Notice <br />("TDN") Na. 91-2-116-4 TV3. <br />Dear Steve: <br />The following comments are submitted on behalf of the <br />Rockcastle Company ("Rockcastle") in response to OSM's April 10, <br />1991 decision regarding the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division's ("CMLRD") April 2, 1991 response to TDN 91-2-116-4 TV3. <br />The TDN .raises numerous issues regarding the June 26, 1990 <br />Agreement between CMLRD and Rockcastle (the "Agreement"), and the <br />bond release process contained therein. OSM's concerns are related <br />to an apparent misconception of the circumstances surrounding <br />execution of the Agreement, and a misunderstanding of the terms and <br />objectives of the Agreement. The Agreement was entered into to <br />abate NOV C-90-007 and NOV C-89-034, and to provide the framework <br />for a compliance schedule in lieu of bond forfeiture pursuant to <br />CMr.un Rule 3.04.1(2). The Agreement sets forth the specific <br />reclamation activities to be completed at the site. More <br />importantly, through the Agreement, CMLRD and Rockcastle have <br />avoided costly and unnecessary litigation, and Rockcastle has <br />accomplished on the ground reclamation in accordance with the CMLRD <br />rules. <br />Rockcastle is particularly concerned that OSM is challenging <br />CMLRD's bonding practices and its ability to enter into settlement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.