ENFORCE34909 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

III IIIIIIIIIIIII III 999 United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING Rcclamanon and Enforcement Suite 1200 505 Marquette Avenue N.W. Albuquerque, New Mexico 8710? April 26, 1995 Mr. Michael B. Long, Director Division of Minerals and Geology Department of Natural Resources 215 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Mr. Long: Permit:C 82.057 Mine Name: Seneca II-W '~~~:EIVED APR 2 N 1995 Division of rounerais 8 Geology The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had not been cited. Date of Federal Inspection: 3/28-31/95; Date of LSCI: 3/8/95 The determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on one or more of the following reasons: The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no State enforcement action was taken. Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection (sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). ~C Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last State complete inspection have not been established (diversion ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, etc.). C-95-008. X Site conditions indicate that the violations noted had been in existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete inspection. C-95-007; C-95- 006. Other: Although the violations were cited by the State, or were abated during a joint inspection, OSM believes that the violations were evident during the last State complete inspection.