My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-12-01_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1989-12-01_REVISION - M1988112 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 8:05:54 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:38:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/1/1989
Doc Name
Objection
From
Miguel A. Gomez
To
MLR
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• iii iiiiuiiiiiu iii , <br />November 21, 1989 <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />Department of Natural Resources c//++ `, ~t <br />1313 Sherman Street ~ lam. ti+ ~ ~ ~l E L~ <br />Denver, CO 08233-2273 nl~r, 1 1989 <br />Uear Mined Land Reclamation Board Members: MINEt? LANo <br />RECI~46AATION DIVISION <br />l would like to enter a formal protest against the amended <br />San 1_uis Project mining plan (permit xM-88-1 l2) as filed by <br />Battle Mountain Gold Mining Company. 1 am a resident n~i' San <br />Luis who continues to be skeptical of the sincerity of Battle <br />Mountain Gold plan to protect ttte fragile environment crf the <br />Rito Seco and the San Luis area. <br />Exhibit E.1 of the amended plan states ttrat "smaller <br />stockpiles of topsoil may be located along roads and adjacent <br />disturbance areas.' if you carefully view tt~e mining s[te, <br />storing topsoil close to existing or newly constructed Haul <br />roads only increases the chances of loss of topsoil Lo erosion. <br />The soil of the Rito Seco is sandy loam, easily washed away by <br />small amounts of water or blown away by Che wind. if valuable <br />topsoil is to be stored for later rer_lamation use, this method of <br />convenient storage for Battle Mountair- Gold must not be <br />allowed. That soil must be stored in a protected location. <br />On page E-4, Battle Mountain Gold states that 'an engineered <br />spillway' will discharge storm water flow into 'the existing <br />natural arroyo." The term 'arroyo' refers to a 'water carved <br />gully' as defined by Webester's dictionary. By spilling the <br />water flow from the tailings area into this existing arroyo, <br />Battle Mountain Gold will increase the erosion of the area. the <br />channeling of the water into a spillway will also increase the <br />amount of flow released into the arroyo, cacrsing much greater <br />volumes of water to rush down the mountain. I think this <br />increases the chances of flood damage to the mountain ecology, <br />as well a being a threat to the town of San Luis duriny major <br />rainstorm, if the tailings pond was ever compromised sod a <br />major spill would occur, all waters would rush directly into San <br />Luis. No additional containment strc[ctcrres gave been <br />engineered. Battle Mountain Gold has admitted that some <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.