Laserfiche WebLink
.. • iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />• <br />~~~ <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES. INC. <br />August 27, 1993 "'-i.t.; ,, <br />Mr. James C. Stevens <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 /pc~.wAN"v <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. (BMRI) - San Luis <br />DMG Permit No. M-88-112 <br />Technical Revision No. OB <br />Dear Mr. Stevens: <br />This letter is written in response to the Division's <br />July 12, 1993 letter in which you outline a proposal to <br />approve TR-OS with five conditions and request BMRI's <br />response to the proposal. At the outset we should note that <br />BMRI is absolutely committed to reaching an acceptable <br />resolution to the issues surrounding TR-08 and moving <br />forward with the measures necessary to implement its <br />conditions. It is in this spirit that BMRI submits tYue <br />following proposal. <br />As noted in your letter, the five conditions for approval <br />were first proposed by the Division in a letter dated (April <br />9 and were discussed extensively in a meeting between BMRI <br />and the Division on July 2. In your July 12 letter, you <br />propose a modification to condition 1 and suggest that the <br />remaining proposed conditions be accepted as set forth in <br />your April 9 letter. Unfortunately, this proposal does not <br />adequately address the issues raised by BMRI at the <br />July 2 meeting and is therefore not acceptable in its <br />present form. However, BMRI groposes that we proceed as <br />follows. <br />As we discussed <br />installation of <br />collection pond <br />acceptable to BI <br />the lined area. <br />installation of <br />BMRI would like <br />these wells and <br />future. <br />at the meeting, condition 2 relating to the <br />an additional monitoring well between the <br />and the toe of the tailings embankment is <br />~IRI. The new well will be located outside <br />Also, condition 4 relating to the <br />a replacement well for M-13 is acceptable. <br />to finalize the details and locations mf <br />proceed with installation in the near <br />In our view, proposed conditions 1, 3, and 5 are all <br />generally related to the groundwater monitoring program and <br />the role that results generated from the monitoring program <br />iy9~ <br />A SUBSIDIARY OF RA17LF .4/pL'ATALV GOl-D C OMPAh'Y <br />P.O. BOX 310 SAN LUIS, COLORADO N1152~03I0 1714)672-336'_ FAX pf9)672_}363 <br />