Laserfiche WebLink
Hernandez, Dan <br />From: Hernandez, Dan <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:25 PM <br />To: 'Jerry Nettleton' <br />Cc: 'kelly.morgan@state.co.us' <br />Subject: RE: FW: Twentymile Coal Company -Foidel Creek Mine, NOV CV-2006-006 Abatement and <br />Extension Request <br />Thanks, Jerry. I've cc'ed this message, and your original message, to Kelly Morgan at <br />WQCD. <br />Dan <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jerry Nettleton [mailto:JNettleton@peabodyenergy.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 11:54 AM <br />To: Hernandez, Dan <br />Subject: Re: FW: Twentymile Coal Company - Foidel Creek Mine, NOV CV-2006-006 Abatement <br />and Extension Request <br />Dan - <br />The amount of sample taken at the time of the discharge was not adequate to perform a WET <br />Test, and the lab did not retain the unused portion. If a WET Test is required, we would <br />have to look at another option, as we discussed yesterday - <br />Best regards, <br />Jerry <br />"Hernandez, Dan" <br /><daniel.hernandez@sta <br />te,co.us> <br />To <br />Jerry <br />Nettleton/TWM/Peabody@PeabodyEnergy <br />10/03/2006 10:49 AM <br />cc <br />Subject <br />Creek Mine, NOV CV-2006-006 Abatement <br />FW: Twent ymile Coal Company - Foidel <br />and Extension Request <br />Hi, Jerry. This is a follow-up to yesterday's comments regarding Step 6d of <br />Cv-2006-006: <br />I spoke by telephone with CDPHE/WQCD yesterday afternoon. Quoting them, CDPE/WQCD stated <br />that: <br />1 <br />