My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE29915
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE29915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:49 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/3/1995
Doc Name
NOV C-95-006 SENECA COAL CO SENECA II W PN C-82-057
From
DMG
To
CIVIL PENALY ASSESSMENT OFFICER
Violation No.
CV1995006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,, iiiiiiiiiiiniiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St .Room 215 Ily~~~ <br />Denier, Colorado 80203 I <br />Phone: U03) 866-3567 <br />FA%: 13031 832-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />May 3, 1995 NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Memo to Civil Penalty Assessment Officer Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />tames 5. Lochhead <br />RE: NOY C-95-00'~ Exeunrve Director <br />Seneca Coal Company Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />Seneca II W, Permit No. C-82-057. <br />Issued 3/31/95 for failure to minimize erosion as necessary to protect topsoil, <br />vegetation, and the hydrologic balance. Disturbed area runoff was <br />concentrated by a pit ramp road, concentrated flow ran across <br />undisturbed area. Resulting gully through undisturbed area <br />measured 5 feet deep, 2 feet wide, sediment delta deposited in 006 <br />Gulch (upchannel from Pond 006) was at least as lazge as 5 x 15 <br />feet and 10 inches deep. <br />Modified 4/7/95 additional sections of Act, Rules, and Permit that had been violated. <br />5/1/95 Seneca Coal submits written argument supporting their position that <br />the TR abatement requirement is unnecessary and redundant. We <br />are developing our response. <br />No additional stuff at this time. Inspection report has been tabbed and highlighted for <br />your convenience. Enjoy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.