My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE29119
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE29119
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:13 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:09:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/24/2000
Doc Name
MEMO PROPOSED PENALTY NOV CV-2000-007
From
DMG
To
ASSESSMENT OFICER
Violation No.
CV2000007
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />STATE iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii` <br />999 <br />OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />DeUarimeN of Natural Resour ces <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />DIVISION O F <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX: 1303) 832-8106 & <br /> GEOLOGY <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MI NING•SAFETY <br /> Internal Memorandum <br /> R~II Owero <br /> Governor <br /> Greg E watcher <br /> Execwi~e Director <br />TO: Assessment Officer bccnacl R. Eong <br />FROM: Sandy Brown D~.az,o„ DnMiar <br />DATE: October 24, ?000 <br />RE: Proposed Penalty <br /> NOV CV-2000-007 <br />NOV CV-?000-007 was issued [o Seneca Coal Company at the Seneca II-W mine. A <br />copy of the NOV is in the folder, SCC stripped topsoil on a hillside that drains into a <br />sediment pond that was not completely constructed. The pond was excavated, the <br />embankment was constructed, the primary dischazge pipe was in and the pond was <br />holding water, but clearly it was not complete as seen in the attached photos. <br />The extent of area from which topsoil soil was salvaged is estimated to be approximately <br />four -five acres. SCC was also constructing a haul road in the drainage, which disturbed <br />several acres, but the haul road drainage is not required to flow through a sediment pond, <br />so I did not count that disturbance as requiring treatment. <br />No dischazge from the sediment pond was observed, all drainage was contained within <br />the pond area. <br />Attached are photos of what 1 observed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.