My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV17909
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV17909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:29:40 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:29:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/10/1992
Doc Name
SENECA II MINE PR 02 PROPOSED DECISION C-80-005
From
DMG
To
PEABODY COAL CO
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiuiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl o(Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 81., Room ? 15 <br />Denver, CO 80201 <br />Phone: 130 31 855-3 557 <br />FAA 130 31 8 32-4105 <br />November 10, 1992 <br />Mr. Gary Wendt <br />Peabody Coal Co <br />Western Division <br />1300 Sauth Yale <br />Flagstaff, AZ 86001 <br />Re: Seneca II Mine, Permit Renewal 02, Proposed Decision <br />(C-80-005) <br />Dear h1r. Wendt: <br />or Oro <br />1F'~~~9 1 <br />ne/: ~ pr4 <br />~'~h' ~v <br />Ie~ ° <br />Ros Romer <br />Gm ernor <br />>nichael B. long <br />Cinsion ~ireaor <br />Enclosed you will find the proposed decision package for the Colorado Division <br />of Minerals and Geoloyy, regarding the renewal of a valid, existing permit for <br />the Seneca II Mine. Notice of the proposed decision will be published in the <br />Steamboat Pilot. The first publication will initiate the thirty day public <br />comment period for the Division's decision. If no objections are received, <br />the Division will renew the Seneca II i~iin2 permit fora third five year term. <br />This proposed decision will initiate the thirty day period in which Peabody <br />coal company should submit a revision which addresses all adequacy issues <br />identified during Division review of the renewal application. If you have <br />questions or are in need of additional information, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />t L~l'le'~~.c~c-~ <br />Susan L idorrison <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />CC: Surface and tdineral Owners <br />OSM <br />c,T,~,T~ n~- ~^~T nR a ran <br />.J 11 11 L. `~ 1 ~\J L~l l ~( 11J ~J <br />0160G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.