Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiuiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br /> aTATE OF COLOlZ~DO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Drp.~nmrni of Natural Resources <br />1 71 V 5hurman 51 . Ruum 2I5 <br />Denver, Coluracb NU_'U3 DIVISION O F <br />Phona. t Ig11 Nhr,-35f,~ MINERAL 5 <br />rnx tsas7n(~-unn, & <br /> GEOLOGY <br />February 26. 1999 MENINGMSAFETY <br />Mr. Michael Altavilla saiowen, <br /> <br />Seneca Coal Company Governor <br /> <br />P.O. Drawer D Greg E Walther <br />Execmrvc Dbeuor <br />Hayden, CO 81639 M~thael N. long <br /> Dimsion Dveanr <br />RE: Seneca II-W, Permit No. C-82-057 <br />Permit Revision No. 2 <br />Dear Mr. Altavilla: <br />The DMG has reviewed Seneca Coal Company's January 28, 1999 response to the DMG's <br />adequacy concerns for Permit Revision No. 2 (PR-2). Based on our review there are some <br />outstanding issues as discussed in this letter. To maintain consistency, the questions are <br />organized according to the numbers in DMG's first letter. There are a couple of additional items <br />that are designated by a lower case letter following the last continent in the pertinent section. <br />2.03 Minimum Requirements for Legal. Financial. Compliance and Related Information <br />Response accepted. The DIvIG will revise the permit stipulations. <br />2. Seneca has responded that Peabody is the owner of the Seneca Coal Company, not <br />a shareholder. The AVS system shows Peabody as shareholder of the Seneca <br />Coal Company. The AVS needs to be changed. Since the AVS is not locked for <br />the Seneca Coal Company, the Division can make the chanties. However, before <br />the changes can be made, Seneca would need to submit official company <br />documentation to the Division that Peabody is the sole owner of the Seneca Coa{ <br />Company. A second approach would be for Seneca to contact OSIvI-AVS directly <br />so that OSM could make the changes in the system. <br />3. Response accepted. <br />4. Response accepted. <br />5. Response accepted. <br />6. Response accepted. <br />