My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13917
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:25:04 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:46:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/19/1993
Doc Name
NEW ELK MINE PN C-81-012 BASIN RESOURCES INC TR 28 RDA ACCESS RD ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
BASIN RESOURCES INC
Type & Sequence
TR28
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Narural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO A0203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 8328106 <br />October 19, 1993 <br />Mr. Ralph Lopez <br />Environmental Engineer <br />Basin Resources, Inc. <br />14300 Highway 12 <br />Weston, CO 81091 <br />RE: New Elk Mine, Permit No. C-81-012, Basin Resources, Inc. <br />Technical Revision No. 28, RDA Access Road, Adequacy Review. <br />Dear Mr. Lopez: <br />The Division has reviewed the submitW for the RDA access road reclassification and has the following <br />questions or comments: <br />1. Several items may need to be changed in the RDA Ditch Design table: <br />a. For ditch section #1, the depth is .47 feet. <br />b. For ditch section #4, the depth is .87 feet and the width is 5.21 feet. <br />c. For ditch section tt6, the depth is .57 feet. <br />2. Please provide page numbers and the revision date on each page, for insertion into the permit. <br />or ro[o <br />~~~ b <br />0 <br />.~, <br />~ rar6 ~ <br />Rny Romrr <br />,overnor <br />michael B. Long <br />Drvision Dirtt for <br />3. The design for Culvert B uses a peak discharge of about 3.5 CFS. However, from the watershed map <br />provided, it appears that culveA B receives the runoff from Watershed #5, which has a peak ntnoff of <br />4.02 CS. Please explain. <br />4. Does the operator intend to assign a ditch type (A, B, etc.) to the ditches? In either case, please <br />provide a map showing the ditches and their cross-sectional measurements. <br />If you have any questions, please call me. <br />Sincerely, <br />)~ ~~~~ <br />oseph J. h <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, DMG <br />Cathy Begej, Greystone Consulting <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />m: \osslscm\newellt. trv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.