My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV13480
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV13480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:24:32 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:42:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/5/2002
Doc Name
Additional Adequacy Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Energy Fuels Mining Company
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />September 5, 2002 <br />George Patterson <br />Energy Fuels Mining Company <br />P.O. Box 449 <br />Florence, CO 81226 <br />RE: Additional Adequacy Review <br />Permit Renewal No 4 (RN-04) <br />Raton Creek Mine, Permit No. C-82-055 <br />Mr. Patterson: <br />DIVISION O F <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINlNG•SA FETY <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Executive Direttor <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Acting Division Direttor <br />As per your letter dated June 24, 2002, the Division of Minerals and Geology extended <br />the decision deadline to August 26, 2002 for responses to issues identified during the <br />initial adequacy review regarding Permit Renewal No. 4 (RN-04) for the Raton Creek <br />Mine. At this time, the Division has not received your responses. Please consider <br />these additional issues in your responses. <br />Recently, a storm event filled the sediment pond at the mine site. This event <br />likely occurred the afternoon of July 29, 2002. Some 68 hours later, on August <br />1, 2002, the pond was observed during an inspection. The water level had <br />receded to the level of the top of the 4-inch riser and the high water mark was <br />estimated at approximately 5 feet above the riser during the peak-of the ~torrrl <br />inflow. <br />Review of the approved permit application page 358Rk indicates that 5 feet of <br />head above the riser would take approximately 60-70 hours to discharge, which <br />is in line with the observation of actual performance. This page also refers to <br />sediment estimates and required storage capacity for the 10-year storm event, <br />calculated to be 4.91 ac-ft (water and sediment combined). <br />To the best of my knowledge, this recent storm event was not sampled by <br />EFMC, nor have any other storm-related events been sampled. This is likely a <br />function of the lack of personnel on-site during these events. The CDPS <br />Industrial General Permit requires monthly visits to check for flow or discharge <br />from the pond outfall and sampling of the discharge if it is occurring. The <br />Division recognizes that the monthly visits are unlikely to coincide with pond <br />discharge, especially at a site where discharge is infrequent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.