REV12927 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• , iii iiiiiiiiniii iii - STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 D I v 1 5 I O N O F Phone: (703) 866-3567 M[ N E RA L S FAX: 1303)832-8106 & GEOLOGY RECLAMATION September 24, 1999 MINING•SAFETY Mr. William A. Bear Jr. Bowie Resources Limited Bowie No. 2 Mine P.O. Box 483 Paonia, Colorado 81428 Bill Owens Governor Geg E. v`la{cher Ere[ulive DireUOr Michael B. Long Drvivon Director RE: Permit Revision No. 3, Facilities Expansion and Production Increase, Bowie No. 2 Mine, Permit No. C-96-083, Bowie Resources Limited Deaz Mc Bear: The Division has finished its adequacy review of Bowie Resources Limited's (BRL) August 30, 1999 submittal for Permit Revision No. 3. This adequacy letter is divided into three main sections. The first section s IabeleG '`GRIGINAL TR-O6 QUESTIONS" and refers to the Division's adequacy review letter for Technical Revision No. 6, dated February 8, 1999. Technical Revision No. 6 was the original submittal for the longwall support facilities, which was then withdrawn and resubmitted as Permit Revision No. 3. The Division's adequacy review letter for Technical Revision No. 6 constituted the first adequacy review letter for Permit Revision No. 3. Questions numbered 1 through 32 aze in this section and follow the fon37at of the original TR-06 letter. Section two is labeled "ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS" and refers to additional questions numbered 33, 34 and 35 which appeazed in the Divisions second adequacy review letter for Permit Revision No. 3, dated July 23, 1999. Also, in this second section is a new question numbered 35 and a new comment numbered 36. The third section is labeled "ORIGINAL TR-07 QUESTIONS" and refers to questions numbered 7, 9, 9a, 96, 9c, 9d, 10, 13, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25 and 28, which were part of Technical Revision No. 7 and have relevance to PR-03. Technical Revision No. 7 was the original submittal for conversion to longwall mining. This technical revision was later withdrawn and resubmitted as Permit Revision No. 2. Most of the questions in Technical Revision No. 7 were later answered in Technical Revision No. 8, Technical Revision No. 9 and Permit Revision No. 2. The remaining questions from Technical Revision No. 7 aze presented here, using the format of the original adequacy review for Technical Revision No. 7, dated February 8, 1999.