My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22991
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:30 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:18:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/1/1995
Doc Name
TEN DAY NOTICE 95-020-179-002 TV 3 SENECA II-W MINE C-82-057
From
DMG
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1995020179002TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />I J 13 Sherman St., Room 21 5 <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 li~ <br /> <br />Phone: 1303) A66-3567 I <br />FA%: 13031 832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br />June 1, 1995 Roy Bonier <br /> Governor <br />Mr. Arthur W. Abbs, Actin Director lames 5. lochhead <br />g Executive Director <br />Office of Surface Mining Michael B. Long <br />Albuquerque Field Office Division Dnecior <br />505 Marquette Avenue NW, Suite 1200 <br />Albuquerque, NM 87102 <br />RE: Ten Day Notice 95-020-179-002, TV 3 <br />Seneca II-W Mine (C-82-057) <br />Dear Mr. Abbs: <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) received the Albuquerque Field Office's <br />(AFO) finding that DMG's response to part three of Ten Day Notice (TDN) 95-020-179-002 <br />was inappropriate on May 30, 1995. This finding appears to be based on a <br />misunderstanding of the current status of Colorado's regulations. Therefore, DMG <br />respectfully requests an informal review of the inappropriate finding, based on the facts <br />presented below. <br />The alleged violation is for failure to certify a haul road. Haul road certifications at the <br />Seneca TI-W Mine had not been updated following modifications of the road's drainage <br />system. DMG's response to the TDN explained that no violation had occurred because <br />Colorado Rule 4.03.1(1)(d) indicates roads are to be certified, "if required by the Division <br />for good cause shown'. DMG had not required the operator to recertify the road following <br />the modifications to the drainage system. Consequently, DMG responded to the TDN by <br />indicating that the alleged violation did not exist. <br />AFO found this response inappropriate because a program amendment submitted for OSM <br />approval by the DMG proposed to remove the "if required by..." phrase from the <br />regulations. AFO is correct in that DMG has proposed to revise Rule 4.03.1. However, the <br />program amendment is not yet effective. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board <br />adopted the program amendment including revision of Rule 4.03.1, on May 24, 1995. The <br />amendment is currently being reviewed by the Colorado Attorney General's office. <br />Following that review, we anticipate publication of the proposed amendment in the <br />Colorado Register in July. The revised regulations will be effective 30 days following that <br />publication. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.