My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE22703
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE22703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:32:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:14:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/10/1997
Doc Name
REVIEW OF TECHNICAL REVISION 80 WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-00
From
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1997022
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />J. E. STOVER ~ ASSOCIATES <br />2768 COMPASS DRIVE, SUITE 101 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (970) 245-4101, FAX 242-7908 <br />MINE ENOINEERINO <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />October 10, 1997 <br />Mr. David Berry <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Re: Review of Technical Revision No. 80 <br />West Elk Mine Permit No. C-80-007 <br />Dear Mr. Berry: <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />CIVIL ENOINEERINO <br />CONST. MANAGEMENT <br />?6~ <br />~a~ <br />'~s~ <br />l66! ~JdO~v <br />~o <br />p~ Gb~s'o. <br />O~~/~J 1Jp n <br />~~ <br />The DMG's letter to me dated September 29, 1997 provided a copy of the text portion <br />of MCC's responses to the DMG's adequacy review for Technical Revision No. 80 (TR- <br />80). MCC's responses addressed Bear Coal Company's concerns about TR-80 which <br />were expressed in my letter to the DMG dated July 15, 1997. On behalf of Bear Coal <br />Company, following are its comments on MCC's thirty page letter to the DMG dated <br />September 22, 1997. <br />1. MCC presents some interesting timing data that was previously unknown to <br />Bear. MCC's 1 NW -SNW longwall panels were sealed in May of 1995. The <br />sealed panels created the NW Sealed Sump. Until May of 1995 the small <br />capacity sumps located in the longwall panels, up-dip and adjacent to the Bear <br />No. 3 Mine, were routinely dewatered. Once these panels were sealed, water <br />was collected and stored in the sumps and the longwall panels. MCC states that <br />operational water as well as minor inflow water from the 8NW panel naturally <br />flowed to the NW Sealed Sump. Presumably, MCC had no reason to minimize <br />the amount of water that flowed to the NW Sealed Sump. <br />Bear states in its 1995 AHR that beginning in June of 1995, The Bear No. 3 <br />Mine began to notice a measurable amount of water building behind the seals in <br />the 3rd West Section. This unanticipated flow coincides perfectly with MCC's <br />sealing of its 1 NW -SNW panels. MCC sealed the panels in May 1995 which <br />allowed increased quantities of water to be stored in the NW Sealed Sump. The <br />resultant seepage from the NW Sealed Sump reached Bear's 3`d West Section <br />during June 1995. The fact the flow from the West Elk mine to the Bear No. 3 <br />Mine increased from 16 gpm to 30 gpm during the following year would be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.