My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07721
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:30 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:45:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/26/1990
Doc Name
ANIMAS HELEN MINE WASTE PILE REVISION PN C-82-055
From
MLRD
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Type & Sequence
MT2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiuiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />137 3 Sherman St., Room 2 t 5 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA%: 303 832 8106 <br />DATE: January 26, 1990 <br />T0: Berhan Keffelew <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Animas/Hel ine a Pile <br />`~~ <br />Revision (Permit #C-82-055) <br />OF COO <br />tik, ' R <br />ie~~ <br />~ /8~6 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R. Banta, <br />Division D:recior <br />I have reviewed the Energy Fuels Mining Company's submittal, which you <br />forwarded to my attention. This information responds to Stipulations No. 2 <br />and 3, placed upon their approved permit, proposing a revision to their <br />approved coal waste pile at the Animas/Helen Mine. Stipulation No. 2 required <br />the operator to analyze the shear strength of the waste material and revise <br />the stability analysis, if appropriate. Stipulation No. 3 required the <br />operator to analyze what the potential impact of subsidence of old underground <br />mine workings might be upon the pile, if the operator was allowed to expand <br />the pile above these workings. <br />The waste pile stipulations were imposed when the previous operator requested <br />approval of a revision to significantly expand the capacity of the waste <br />pile. The stability analysis included in that revision application relied <br />upon literature derived representative material shear strength information. <br />The Division found the assumed material shear strength information to be <br />conservative, but required verification through testing of actual waste <br />material. The required materials testing has been canpleted. The current <br />operator has amended the waste pile design, reducing the maximum waste <br />capacity from 4.0 million cubic yards to 1.3 million cubic yards. The facial <br />slopes are being reduced in grade from 2(h ):1 (v) to 3(h ):1(v). The smaller <br />revised waste pile will not infringe upon any previously undermined ground. <br />In my opinion the operator's submittal has demonstrated that the waste pile <br />will achieve a factor of safety (F OS) in excess of 2.5, well above the <br />required minimum FOS of 1.5. In addition, they have deleted the proposed area <br />of deposition overlying the underground workings. Therefore, the Division's <br />concerns, as expressed in Stipulations No. 2 and 3, have been satisfied. I <br />recommend, therefore, the the Division find that Stipulations No. 2 and 3 have <br />been satisfied. Further, I recommend acceptance of the geotechnical slope <br />stability and construction specification aspects of the amended coal waste <br />pile design. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.