My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-05-17_REVISION - M2000158
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2000158
>
2001-05-17_REVISION - M2000158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:54:36 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:11:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2000158
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/17/2001
Doc Name
RIVERBANK AND PIT SLOPE ARMORING PROPOSAL TR TO S&H MINE SECTION 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION
From
DMG
To
PLATTE SAND & GRAVEL LLC
Type & Sequence
TR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />STATE • iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nanl ral Resources <br />131 3 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Coora[10 80203 I <br />DIVISION O F i <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 MINERAL 5' ~ <br />FA%: (303) 832 8106 & <br />I <br /> G EOLOGY <br />Ma 17,2001 <br />y RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Rocky Hoffschneider gill Owens <br />Platte Sand & Gravel LLC ~°vefnOr <br />P.O. BOX 180 ereF E. w,irher <br /> <br />Littleton, CO 80106 Eeecwive Dv°aor <br /> Michael 8. Long <br /> Division DireUUr <br />RE: Riverbank and Pit Slope Armoring Proposal, Technical Revision <br />to S&H Mine Section 112 Reclamation Permit Application, Platte <br />Valley Sand and Gravel, File No. M-2000-158 <br />Dear Mr. Hoffschneider, <br />Platte Sand & Gravel LLC has provided a technical revision (TR) to further address coltcerns with erosion <br />potential through the gravel pit mining cells during a large flood event. The TR includes an illustration of <br />locations that the Applicant has determined to be sensitive areas with the potential for excessive erosion. 'The TR <br />includes a proposal and designs to stabilize certain of these potentially sensitive areas by armoring through [he <br />placement of riprap. The TR also includes cos[ estimates for [he placement of riprap and a description of the <br />timing of riprap installation relative to the sequence of excavation in the gravel pits. The Division's review of [he <br />TR is broken out into four sections in this memorandum as follows: <br />• The deterntination of locations that may be subject to erosion during a large flood. <br />• The specification and drawings that will govern the sizing and placement of riprap. <br />• The estimated cost to purchase and take delivery of riprap that meets specification, and to install [he riprap ill <br />accordance with designs and drawings approved by the Division. <br />• The timetable for riprap installation, in particular the installation of the riverbank riprap. <br />As a reminder, the purpose of the Flood control/mitigation plan is to minimize the potential for excessive scouring <br />and erosion of pit slopes and of berms protectiltg critical structures such as gas pipelines, and of offsite impacts <br />due [o sedimentation or realignment of the existing river channel. <br />Riprnp Locutions <br />In order [o prevent excessive erosion, areas that may be subject to scour during a Flood should be armored. To <br />identify areas of scour, the depth and velocity of floodwaters should be estimated and the gradation of the soil and <br />subsoil (sand and gravel) may be examined along with vegetation characteristics to determine if the erosive power <br />of the flood will cut into the vegetation and soil. Placement of larger and heavier material (riprap), that cannot be <br />lifted and moved by Floodwater, will prevent erosion and down cutting in locations identified to be prone to scour. <br />There are a number of published computational methods available to determine the sizing and gradation of riprap <br />required to armor against erosive flows of different velocities. <br />Depth and velocity of floodwater increases exponentially in flood events of increasingly lower probability of <br />occurrence. The ten-percent annual chance Flood (tlte so-called ten-year flood) results in a substantially lower <br />flow, depth, and velocity than aone-percent annual chance flood (the 100-year return period event). Designs for <br />armoring against erosion during a 100-year flood would most likely fail during a much larger, but longer return <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.