My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV03209
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV03209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:01:00 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:07:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/21/1997
Doc Name
TR-70 1995 ANNUAL REPORT TRAPPER MINE PN C-81-010
From
DMG
To
TRAPPER MINE
Type & Sequence
TR70
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r, <br /> <br /> III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 r <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 I <br />~~~ <br /> <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 I <br />FAX:(303)832-8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT Oi <br /> NATURAL <br />February 21, 1997 RESQLIRCE~ <br /> Roy Romer <br /> Governor <br />)amen 5. La:hhead <br />Mr. Forrest Luke eattmive oo-ectnr <br />Environmental Manager Michael B. Long <br />Trapper Mine Division Director <br />P. O. Box 187 <br />Craig, Colorado 81626 <br />RE: Technical Revision No. 70, 1995 Annual Report, Trapper Mine, <br />Permit No. C-81-010, Trapper Mining Inc. <br />Dear Mr. Luke: <br />The Division has completed its review of Sections 1.0, 3.0, 4.0, <br />5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 of the 1995 Annual Report, for Technical Revision <br />No. 70, and has the following questions or comments. The Division's <br />adequacy letter concerning Section 2.0, Annual Hydrology Report, <br />was sent to Trapper on February 11, 1997. The last question or <br />comment in that letter was number 11, so the first question or <br />comment in this letter is number 12. <br />Section 1.0, Annual Reclamation Report <br />12. The Division finds the ARR to be complete and accurate. <br />Section 3.0, Drainaaewav Reconstruction, Improvements and Repairs <br />13. Sheets 1 of 2 and 2 of 2 of the map entitled "Drainage <br />Reconstruction" use different annotation symbols for contour <br />ditches. These two sheets also use different annotation <br />symbols for reconstructed drainages. For the sake of clarity, <br />please resolve this difference by using the same annotation on <br />both sheets for contour ditches and the same annotation on <br />both sheets for reconstructed drainages. <br />14. In comparing sheet 1 of 2 of the 1995 Drainage Reconstruction <br />map with the same map from the 1994 Annual Report, it appears <br />that there are two sections of the Johnson Gulch drainage that <br />appear on the 1994 map, but which do not appear on the 1995 <br />map. Please explain. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.