My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV00985
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV00985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:58:37 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:49:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/20/1996
Doc Name
TR 40 DESERADO MINE C-81-018
From
DMG
To
DAN MATHEWS
Type & Sequence
TR40
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-~: <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl n( Nalu ral Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Room 215 ~{y~~ <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 II <br />Phone: (3031 8663567 <br />FAX: 13031 832-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />TO: DdII MathBW9 ~ Rny ROmer <br />Governor <br />FrOID: H8rbar8 PBVilk ~ lames S. Lochheari <br />Enecmrve Dueanr <br />Micharl B. Long <br />Date: May 20~ 1996 Division Director <br />Re: Technical Revision No. TR-40 <br />Deaerado Mine (C-81-018) <br />I have reviewed the portion of TR-40 which concerns Western Fuels - <br />Utah's (WFU) proposal to eliminate the biennial sampling <br />requirement for groundwater monitoring wells in Leases C-8424 and <br />C-8425. This memo replaces my memo of Mav 17, 1996. I have since <br />been able to locate more baseline data for the Deserado Mine. My <br />current opinion is stated below: <br />WFU interprets the footnote of Table II.C-11 to mean that <br />a one-time only sampling is required prior to entering <br />the subject Lease areas. The Division does not share <br />this interpretation. The footnote reads, "These holes <br />will be sampled and analyzed for the parameters in Table <br />II.C-8 prior to entering lease (sic) C-8424 and C-8425." <br />It does not discuss the sampling requirements during <br />mining of the subject leaseholds. <br />However, approximately three years of baseline data were <br />collected for the wells in question. I believe that <br />sampling the wells for chemical parameters one time prior <br />to entering the leaseholds plus recommencing water <br />quality sampling in these wells at least one year prior <br />to requesting a final bond release would be sufficient to <br />assess impacts of mining on the groundwater quality. In <br />addition, water level monitoring should continue on a <br />biennial basis, as water level impacts are more likely to <br />occur, and tracking the trend in water levels can be <br />useful for keeping the PHC current. <br />Mr. John J. Mehlhoff of the BLM in Meeker wrote a letter <br />regarding this TR. He said that the elimination of <br />sampling should not occur, because "biennial sampling is <br />minimal to achieve baseline data." You may wish to <br />inform Mr. Mehlhoff that his concerns were taken into <br />consideration, and the decision was made based on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.