Laserfiche WebLink
,. _ <br />,~ <br />~.~ <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • o`'~J~ ~ .~-sTF "~ <br />INSPECTION9Rtrun f - ~ ~~~ • • <br />i~f:V LJf»J ~`~u <br />r; <br />Site: National King Coal Mine, Hesperus, Colorado ~ ~~^f.,~5~~£~ ;";;r <br />Inspected By: Don R. May, P.E., Project Engineer ~`~°~;;j'~,~~~Lh" <br />Inspection Date: Quarterly Inspection, January 2, 1999 ~`~~~+!--~ ~•"' <br />Ponds: The east and west sedimentation ponds and their embankments appear in good <br />condition. The west pond is shown in photograph 1. The overflow pipe connecting the <br />west pond to the east pond can be seen on the left side. As mentioned last quarter, the <br />elevation of the inlet of this pipe relative to the high water level in the west pond should <br />be confirmed. In addition, the entrance to this pipe should be covered by a screen to <br />prevent blockage by debris. All pipe inlets, outlets and spillways should be periodically <br />cleaned. The west pond staff gage read less than 2 feet. <br />Drainaoe Ditches: The east side (below waste pile) and west side drainage channels <br />appear in good general condition. The ditch draining the hillside behind the shop has <br />been blocked by a loader bucket of dirt as seen in photograph 2. This blockage should <br />be removed. The black corrugated plastic pipe which begins behind the shop and exits <br />into the main channel which empties into the west pond should be cut off at the point at <br />which it penetrates the ditch bank. Rip-rap should be placed below this pipe to prevent <br />scouring. Photograph 3 shows the clear water intercept ditch on the east side of the yard <br />above the office. As seen this ditch is partially blocked and should be cleaned. The <br />remainder of the yard drainage features appear in good shape. <br />Ditches have been cut down the face of the water rock pile on both sides as required by <br />the reclamation plan. In both cases the ditches have not been armored and some <br />erosion is occurring (photographs 4 and 5). Due to the rocky nature of the material, <br />erosion has been restricted and does not pose any immediate threat. However, in the <br />long run, these ditches need to be armored with rip rap (or alternative treatment) as <br />stated in the plans. The inlet to the pile on the north side should have a trashrack <br />(photograph 4). <br />All drainage features, with the exceptions stated above, have been constructed and are <br />operating as stated in the drainage plan submitted to the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology. <br />Coal Waste Pile: Based on a June 30, 1998 survey the upper'/< of the face of the <br />waste pile along the entire length is slightly steeper than the design value of 2.5:1. This <br />area should tie regraded and surveyed to confirm the design slope. In addition the <br />design calls fora 2% cross slope and a 1% longitudinal slope on the top of the pile. <br />Recently placed fill should be graded and compacted to conform to the reclamation plan <br />requirements. The end of the existing underdrain should be located and plans for the <br />construction of the structure to connect it with the extension should be made as per the <br />reclamation plan. <br />Except for the items mentioned above the fill on the waste pile has been constructed as <br />specified in the design approved by the Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />