My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE70001
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
800000
>
PERMFILE70001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 11:19:08 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 11:10:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990112
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/3/1990
Doc Name
PN M-90-112 STATE PIT
From
DOW
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~cTnTr nF rr~1 nannr~ • • <br />Roy Romer, Governor III IIIlillllllll III <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISIC)N ®F WILDLIFE 999 <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTU NIiY EMPLOYER <br />Perry D. Olson, Director <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Coloradc 80216 <br />Telephone: (303)297.1192 <br />3 October 1990 <br />Mr. S1:even Renner <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 :>herman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />SUBJ: Mined Land Permit No. M-90-112; State Pit <br />Dear ~~teve: <br />0.EFER i0. <br />I l ~.c i <br />OCT 0 9 1990 <br />Mined Land <br />Reclamation Division <br />F'e have reviewed the above referenced application for a 112 <br />permit and offer the following comments. <br />The application, as written, is confusing and ambiguous <br />regarding the mining plan and reclamation plan. It is unclear, as <br />stated, how reclamation shall proceed since the bond amount was <br />based upon reclaiming only 60 acres of the 755 acres indicated as <br />being affected by mining. However, after a conversation with Dan <br />Hernandez, it is my understanding that the applicant has proposed <br />the use of a "floating" bond which will cover 60 acres at a time <br />with reclamation being performed as mining proceeds. If that is <br />the case then the Division recommends bond be set based upon the <br />cost of reclaiming 180 acres. In that way, sufficient time will <br />be given to allow establishment of vegetation on the first 60 acre <br />parcel when applicant wishes to move the mining process off of the <br />second 60 acre parcel into the third 60 acre parcel. We believe <br />this to be especially prudent due to the local climatic conditions <br />that e:tist in the Pueblo area with regard to precipitation, wind, <br />and ambient temperature. These conditions make it especially <br />difficult for revegetation efforts and as such may require <br />additional time for establishment of adequate stands of vegetation. <br />This proposal would seem especially advantageous to the applicant <br />in tha~= it would allow them to proceed with mining of the 121st <br />acre even if reclamation on the first 60 acre parcel does not meet <br />MLRD standards. This methodology also would address our Concerns <br />regarding a local herd of antelope utilizing this site and adjacent <br />areas. Although the life of the mine is expected to be 30 years <br />a minimum number of acres will be affected at any one time since <br />reclamation will proceed with the mining operation allowing <br />contincled use of different portions of the site by antelope. <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director <br />WILDLIFE GOMMISSIOIJ, George VanDenBerg, Chairman . Robert L Freidenberger, Vice Chairman . William R. Hegberg, Secretary <br />Eldon W. Cooper, Member . Rebecca L. Frank Member o Dennis Luttrell, Member . Gene B. Peterson, Member . Larry M. Wright, Member <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.