Laserfiche WebLink
~cTnTr nF rr~1 nannr~ • • <br />Roy Romer, Governor III IIIlillllllll III <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DIVISIC)N ®F WILDLIFE 999 <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTU NIiY EMPLOYER <br />Perry D. Olson, Director <br />6060 Broadway <br />Denver, Coloradc 80216 <br />Telephone: (303)297.1192 <br />3 October 1990 <br />Mr. S1:even Renner <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 :>herman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />SUBJ: Mined Land Permit No. M-90-112; State Pit <br />Dear ~~teve: <br />0.EFER i0. <br />I l ~.c i <br />OCT 0 9 1990 <br />Mined Land <br />Reclamation Division <br />F'e have reviewed the above referenced application for a 112 <br />permit and offer the following comments. <br />The application, as written, is confusing and ambiguous <br />regarding the mining plan and reclamation plan. It is unclear, as <br />stated, how reclamation shall proceed since the bond amount was <br />based upon reclaiming only 60 acres of the 755 acres indicated as <br />being affected by mining. However, after a conversation with Dan <br />Hernandez, it is my understanding that the applicant has proposed <br />the use of a "floating" bond which will cover 60 acres at a time <br />with reclamation being performed as mining proceeds. If that is <br />the case then the Division recommends bond be set based upon the <br />cost of reclaiming 180 acres. In that way, sufficient time will <br />be given to allow establishment of vegetation on the first 60 acre <br />parcel when applicant wishes to move the mining process off of the <br />second 60 acre parcel into the third 60 acre parcel. We believe <br />this to be especially prudent due to the local climatic conditions <br />that e:tist in the Pueblo area with regard to precipitation, wind, <br />and ambient temperature. These conditions make it especially <br />difficult for revegetation efforts and as such may require <br />additional time for establishment of adequate stands of vegetation. <br />This proposal would seem especially advantageous to the applicant <br />in tha~= it would allow them to proceed with mining of the 121st <br />acre even if reclamation on the first 60 acre parcel does not meet <br />MLRD standards. This methodology also would address our Concerns <br />regarding a local herd of antelope utilizing this site and adjacent <br />areas. Although the life of the mine is expected to be 30 years <br />a minimum number of acres will be affected at any one time since <br />reclamation will proceed with the mining operation allowing <br />contincled use of different portions of the site by antelope. <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Hamlet J. Barry, Executive Director <br />WILDLIFE GOMMISSIOIJ, George VanDenBerg, Chairman . Robert L Freidenberger, Vice Chairman . William R. Hegberg, Secretary <br />Eldon W. Cooper, Member . Rebecca L. Frank Member o Dennis Luttrell, Member . Gene B. Peterson, Member . Larry M. Wright, Member <br />