PERMFILE64663

• Permit No: M2000118
• IBM Index Class Name: Permit File
• Doc Date: 10/30/2000
• Doc Name: PINO PIT FN M-2000-118 REVIEW OF APPLICANT RESPONSE TO DIVISIONS ADEQUANCY REVIEW
• From: DMG
• To: BARNHART AGENCY INC
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

~IIII~II~III~I~IIII
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY
Department of Natural Resources
137 }Sherman 6L, Room ?1 S
Denver, Colorado 60:03
Phone. [phone]
FAX. (3031 83? 8106
October 30, 2000
Mr. !oe Gagliano
Barnhart Agency
212 W. 13ih St.
Pueblo, Co 81003
RE: Pino Pit (File M-2000-I 18) Review of applicant response to Division's adequacy review
Dear Mr. Gagliano:
The Division has completed its review of your response to the Division's initial adequacy review of the permit
application For the Pino Pit and has identified [he remaining adequacy issues:
PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL WARRANTIES: These required wartanties have not yet been
provided For the application.
Although the permit application may eventually receive approval from the Division, a permit will not be
issued for this operation until acceptable Performance and Financial Warranties aze received by the Division.
NOTICES: The Division will accept the evidence of notice of the application being received by Ernest
Shafer and of the attempt to notify Ed Pino as required by Rules 1.6.2(1)(e)(i) and (ii). The Division will also
accept the public notice as provided, however, the evidence that it was published according to the schedule
indicated has not been submitted.
The applicant must provide evidence that the public notice required by Rule 1.6.2(1)(d) has been
published the required number of times.
~~
DIVISION OF
MINERALS
GEOLOGY
RECLAMATION
MINING•SAFETY
BJI Owens
Governor
Greg E. bVal~her
Etecunve Director
Michael B. Long
Drv~sion Director
EXHIBIT C (Rule 6.4.3(g)): The Division will accept that Ed Pino owns the fences located within 200 feet
east and north of the azea to be affected by the proposed operation. The owner of the road that lies outside of the
affected area but still within 200 feet of it, however, has still not been identified. This is a road that will be used by
the applicant to access the operation and to haul material from it.
The applicant must identify the owner of the road that lies within 200 feet of the area to be affected by the
mining operation.
EXHIBIT L (Rule 6.4.12): As a result of the agreements made with the Division in regard to changes in
the proposed mining plan and our discussion of the results of your subsequent re-evaluation of the cost of
reclamation based on those changes, the Division will accept your revised estimate of the cost of reclaiming the
disturbance associated with the proposed mining operation.
The applicant must provide a financial warranty totaling S 115,400.00 in acceptable form in order that a
permit be issued for the proposed mining operation.
EXHIBITS (Rule 6.3.18): The Division will accept the compensation agreement provided by the
applicant to cover damages to the two fences owned by Ed Pino. However, the applicant has not identified the
owner of the road lying within 200 feet of the area to be affected by the proposed mining operation and has not
satisfied the requirements of this Rule for that road.