My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO27475
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO27475
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:46:50 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 8:01:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
4/17/1989
Doc Name
CHANNEL CERTIFICATIONS DRAINAGES 7 31-1 41 51 51W ECKMAN PARK C-81-07
From
MLRD
To
COLO YAMPA COAL CO
Permit Index Doc Type
PROF POND CERTIFICATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii ~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />Roy Romer, Gove <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />April 7, 1989 <br />Mr. Ridc Mills <br />Colorado Yampa Coal Company <br />29587 Routt County Road No. 27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80027 <br />Re: Channel Certifications - Drainages 7, 31-1, 31-2, 41, 51, 51W <br />Eckman Park - C-81-071 <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />We have reviewed the ACZ and Ground Engineering Consultants (GEC) inspection <br />reports for the above-referenced channels. The ACZ reports indicate <br />unresolved problems and incomplete construction as of September 30, 1988 <br />for Channels 31-1, 31-2, 51 and 51 W. It is possible that all of the remaining <br />problems were specifically addressed during the October 31, 1988 inspection, <br />which is referenced in the November 1, 1968 letter from Conrad Parrish. The <br />final inspection report, however, has not been submitted. <br />Please review the inspection reports, then submit additional certification <br />inspection reports which clearly indicate that all unresolved problems were <br />checked and corrected. Perhaps the October 31, 1988 inspection report will <br />provide all of the remaining required information. <br />We note that the GEC reports indicate that in some areas, riprap gradations <br />are close to the required specifications, but absolute compliance is not <br />indicated. Specifically, as-built gradations are not included for Area 31, <br />and the gradations for Areas 41 and 51 indicate that the as-built gradation <br />includes materials that are significantly smaller than the design specifi- <br />cations. Refer to Tables 1 and 2 for the actual numbers. <br />Please provide statements that are certified by a registered professional <br />engineer which clearly indicate that the as-built riprap gradations for <br />Areas 31, 41 and 51 are adequate to satisfy the design specifications for <br />these channels. <br />Finally, the GEC reports indicate that rounded to subrounded rock was used in <br />the channels. Most riprap specification require the use of rock that is not <br />rounded, and if rounded rock is used, gradation size is usually increased. <br />We understand that the permit approval did not specifically require more <br />angular rock. Future projects should be designed to use more angular rock, <br />or a size adjustment should be included if rounded rock is used. <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203-2273 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.