My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PERMFILE55613
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Permit File
>
600000
>
PERMFILE55613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 10:58:24 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2004067
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/15/2004
Doc Name
Comments
From
I.L. and L.M. Turner
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit ~ -~Contioentai?:: <br />Class: ' Type-Seq.:_ <br />From:r?" ~ ~ To:~ <br />Doc. Name: <br />Doc. Date (if no date stamp): ~ /S O <br />CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br />TO: Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman St., Rm: 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />FROM: I.L. and L.M Turner 3945 Douglas Mtn. Dr. <br />Golden, CO 80403 <br />RE: Proposed MMRR Quarry <br />Gilpin, County, CO <br />Comments Concerning Construction Material 112 Permit <br />Based on <br />Reports Provided to the Public <br />Please note the following: <br />~~~~4 ~~V~ ~® <br />DEC 15 2004 <br />~iciai::. M Gs.cr..i, ~ Geology <br />We ore the contiguous property owners: I.L. and L.M. Turner and own <br />approximately 95 Ac. In Gilpin County (includes 9 Ac. In Jefferson <br />County. See Clear Creek District Water Providers' Exhibit (map) C -1. <br />Please note an error in designated ownership: The SW 1 /4 of the SW 1 /4 <br />Sec. 24, T3S, R72W (38.46 Ac.) belongs to Turner NOT to Wolf as <br />designated. <br />Though this error may seem inconsequential, it tends to falsely <br />enhance the Wolf property's shielding other ownership from any <br />quarry operations and to lessen Turner's exposure, Also please note <br />that the presence of such an error of material fact tends to bring into <br />question the accuracy of other parts of this permit application. <br />The possible occurrence of uranium mineralzafion in blast hole <br />cuttings and airborne dust. Reference to the attached figure from: <br />"Geology of uranium deposits !n the Front Range, Colorado": P.K Sims <br />and D.M. Sheridan, 1964 * shows that there exists the possibility of <br />cutting through significant uranium mineralization during mining <br />operations and having it occur in dust from drilling, blasting, and rock- <br />crushing operations. Should this project be allowed, certainly uranium <br />analyses of early drill cuttings should be made before giving a final go- <br />ahead to production. Routine uranium blast hole cuttings analyses <br />during any production should also be required. <br />*(See also: "Radioactive Mineral Occurrences of Colorado", 8utletin <br />40. Nelson -Moore, Collins and Hornbaker, Colorado Geological <br />Survey, 1978. 1058 p. Gilpin County, p. 159-166 and Clear Creek <br />County, p. 96-110. Two maps from this publication are attached. <br />December 11, 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.