My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HYDRO23187
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Hydrology
>
HYDRO23187
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:43:48 PM
Creation date
11/20/2007 3:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
Hydrology
Doc Date
6/6/2005
Doc Name
Spring Water Issue and the CDPHE
From
Joe Dudash
To
Sandy Brown
Permit Index Doc Type
Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Na[ural Resources <br />7313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: June 6, 2005 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V 1 5 1 0 N O F <br />MIN SRALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />0.EC LANATION•NINING <br />' SAf ETY•SCIFNCE <br />TO: Sandy Brown Bill Owens <br /> Governor <br />FROM: Joe DUdash r~ ~ Russell George <br /> ~ <br />I <br />~ Executive Director <br />RE: ~J <br />Bear No. 3 Mtne, ermit No. C-81-033, Bear Coal Company Ronald W. CatUny <br /> Bond Release No. 3 (SL-3), Spring Water Issue and the CDPHE Division Director <br /> Natural Resource Trustee <br />This memo is in response to your request for information about the spring water issue at the Bear No. 3 Mine <br />Sometime in late 2004 or early 2005, 1 noticed that the DMR's for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2004 <br />for the Bear No. 3 Mine stated that there were no discharges from the spring water treatment pond. In March of <br />2005, I asked Basil Bear to explain this since that pond always discharges. He said his understanding was that, <br />since the water was reclassified from mine water to spring water in the DMG permit, the NPDES discharge <br />point did not have to be sampled anymore. So, he said, he just filled out the DMR as "no discharge" for the <br />spring water discharge. <br />explained to Basil that changing the DMG permit does not automatically change the NPDES permit. Basil said <br />he knew and that Jim Stover was working with the CDPHE on amending the NPDES permit, but sampling of <br />that NPDES point could be stopped in the meantime. In the NPDES permit, that outfall is NPDES point 001 and <br />is described as being mine drainage to the North Fork. <br />called Chris Gates in March 2005 and he said there was no such amendment in house. [explained to Chris that <br />the DMG permit designation was changed from mine water to spring water to simply reflect that the water was <br />coming out of the hillside near the old Edwards Portal. The DMG had no proof that it was actually mine water <br />so the name was changed. The name change was not meant as a findings. [also mentioned to Chris that the <br />DMG had taken its own water samples to determine the cause of the orange color in the water. In March, [ <br />asked Jim Stover about the NPDES permit changes and he said he had not applied for the amendment yet. <br />In April of 2005, the Division received the letter dated April 4, 2005 from the CDPHE (by way of Jim Stover) <br />concerning this spring water. 1 have three comments concerning this CDPHE letter: <br />1) In the last sentence of the first paragraph, the letter states that the Bear Coal Company monitors this <br />spring water "as if the water were a part of its discharge permit". However, according to the NPDES <br />permit, it is a part of the current discharge permit, specifically NPDES discharge point 001 (Mine <br />Drainage to N Fk Gunnison). <br />2) The letter states that the DMG determined that the water was spring water associated with the Landslide, <br />not mine water drainage. However, the Division never formed conclusions about the origin of this water. <br />3) The last sentence of the letter states that the NPDES permit does not need to be amended to show the <br />proposed bypassing of the treatment pond and rerouting of the spring water directly to the river because <br />the proposed changes won't alter the NPDES permit. However, the letter does not mention that the <br />NPDES sampling can be stopped for that discharge point, as the Bear Coal Company has claimed. <br />If you have any questions, please let me know. <br />c:/word/bear3/sl3 memo 1 <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land RErlamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.