APPCOR11533

• Permit No: C1982056
• IBM Index Class Name: Application Correspondence
• Doc Date: 2/22/1983
• Doc Name: MEMO REVIEW OF RESPONSES TO PAR FOR FOIDEL CREEK MINE PR APPLICATION FN C-056-82
• From: MLRD
• To: SANDY EMRICH
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• III IIIIIIIIIIIII III • ~~ ~~
DEPARTMENT OF rvH i unH99ntavurtCES ~J'
D. Monte Pascoe. Execwwe Dneclor
MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION
DAVID C. SHELTON Director
Ric hartl D Lamm
Governor
DATE: February 22, 1983
TU: Sandy Emrich
FROM: Roy L. Cox
RE: Review of Responses to the PAR for the Foidel Creek Mine Permit
Revision Application, File No. C-056-82
In my review of the responses to the PAR and the permit revision
application, I have identified several inadequacies. The most critical
inadequacy in the application is the lack of an adequate section on
probable hydrologic consequences of mining (PHC). This section is
extremely important in preparing the cumulative hydrologic impact study
(CHIS) and also in judging the applicants ability to meet the performance
standards under 4.05.
The adequacy review comments and requests are organized below using the
headings and citations used in the preliminary adequacy review..
423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. [phone]