My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10171
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10171
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:35 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:08:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/27/1981
Doc Name
NORTHERN COAL CO REVIEW PROCESS
From
MLR
To
NORTHERN COAL CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t ~ <br />STATE OF COLOR4D0 RiC HARD D. L4MM. Govmmr III III III III IIII III <br />999 <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />D. Monte Pascoe, Etecutrve Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />423 Centennial Building,1313Sherman Streef <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Direcior <br />Mr. Jerry McPhee <br />Northern Coal Company <br />P. O. Box 27583, Terminal Annex <br />Denver, Colorado 80217 <br />Re: Northern Coal Company's Review Process <br />Dear Jerry: <br />As you know, the Mined Land Reclamation Division and the Office of Surface <br />Mining have been trying to develop a cooperative review process for the <br />Northern Meeker Area Mines. The problem in coordinating this review has <br />stemed from the issue as to whether an Environmental Impact Statement needs <br />to be written to meet NEPA compliance requirements. It is my understanding <br />that the Office of Surface Mining has formally initiated the Environmental <br />Impact Statement process thus triggering the time clocks. Now, the important <br />step that the Mined Land Reclamation Division, in cooperation with the <br />Office of Surface Mining, needs to take is to provide you with comments on <br />the technical adequacy of your permit application. A review schedule has been <br />set up by the two agencies to provide you with substantive comments by <br />mid-May. <br />I have discussed the MLR review process with members of your staff and the <br />Office of Surface Mining as it pertains to the requirement that MLR send <br />you a preliminary adequacy letter within 60 days. The general consensus has <br />been that, at this point, a preliminary adequacy letter would not contribute <br />significantly to moving this review along. Also, the Office of Surface Mining <br />has already addressed a number of preliminary concerns during their apparent <br />completeness review (ACR), similar to what we would address in a preliminary <br />adequacy letter. The more important Letter will be the cooperative review <br />letter we will send you in mid-May. <br />For this reason we will not send you a pre2imi.nary adequacy Ietter and instead <br />will accept the permit application as it stands today. The MLRD will begin <br />immediately to analyze specific technical issues in cooperation with the <br />(cont'd) <br />April 27, 1981 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.