Laserfiche WebLink
~~ • • illlllllllllllllllll <br />,.4~J~ STATE O~ CC~~vl9~~~ <br />Roy Romer. Governor <br />~.. <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />\\,,.~ ,' <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION ~: ; ~ -' i-~, <br />FRED R. BANTA, Director <br />DATE: October 25, 1989 <br />T0: Randy Price \ <br />~~ <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton ~- ,.-v.t- `~^~ <br />RE: Fruita Mt' Recla, ion Revision - Fruita "1 Bench Stability <br />Pursuant to your request, I have <br />Fruita #1 Rock Fill" included as <br />Reclamation Permit of the Fruita <br />prepared by Grep Lewicki, Colo. P <br />Computer slope stability routine <br />of Kentucky, named "REAME". This <br />widely known and accepted within <br />reviewed the "Slope Stability analysis of the <br />Appendix A within the "Application for <br />11ine Complex..." This stability analysis was <br />.E. X22804. Mr. Lewicki's analvsis uses a <br />developed by Dr. Yana Huano of the University <br />computer simulation modeling routine is <br />the Civil Enaineerinp discipline. <br />Material samples were collected from the fill by Mr. Lewicki and subjected to <br />laboratory analysis. The actual observed field material density values were <br />used to prepare samples for laboratory shear strength testino. A shear <br />strength value of 0 cohesion and an angle of internal friction of 37 decrees <br />were determined at the field density of 116 lbs. /cu.ft. Dr. HUa n0's <br />conversion technique was utilized to compensate for oversized durable material <br />within the fill, resulting in an effective shear strength of 41 deorees. <br />While this is an empirical correction technique, Fir. Lewicki compensated for <br />its use by performing sensitivity-t we ca]culations usino a range of shear <br />strength values. <br />The slope stability analysis determined that at a reduced facial anole of <br />2.Dh:1.Ov, the minimum projected slope stability factor of safety encountered <br />fora failure slice of more than 5 feet in thickness was 1.77. When usino the <br />observed lab value of 37 deorees, the minimum safety factor is 1,54. Placing <br />the modeled plane of failure deeper in the fill results in progressively <br />increasing factors of safety. <br />In my opinion, Mr. Lewicki has done a commendable job of analyzing the Fruita <br />#,1 Rock Fill's slope stability. His technique is empirically based, but his <br />approach is reasonable and conservative in his choice of material strength <br />values. I recommend that we accept his analysis as submitted. Further, 1 <br />recommend that we approve the proposed reduction in facial slope angle of the <br />Fruita 1 Rock Fill to 2.Oh:1.Ov. The analysis projects that an acceptable <br />slope safety factor in excess of the required 1.5 will be achieved with the <br />proposed configuration. <br />