My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPCOR10105
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Application Correspondence
>
1000
>
APPCOR10105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 6:26:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2007 2:07:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/12/1986
Doc Name
REVIEW OF SOILS AND VEGETATION BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA FRUITA MINE COMPLEX
From
MLRD
To
TO GILLIS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`; <br />,,; •. <br />~~I II~II~~~~I~~~ I~~ <br />sss <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David H. Gelche; Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SHELTON, Director <br />Richartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DATE: June 12, 1986 <br />T0: Tom Gi 11 i s ,(,/// <br />FROM: Peter O'Connor <br />RE: REVIEW OF SOILS AND VEGETATION BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA <br />FRUITA MINE COMPLEX <br />Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the soils and vegetation baseline <br />data contained in the Central Lease application as well as reviewed the <br />July 1, 1985 replies to the Division's 1984 Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />(PAR). I have broken IRy comments down by discipline for ease of reference. <br />2.04.9 Soils Resource Information <br />1. A generalized (Order 3) soil survey was presented for the 47,000 acres <br />of the "Fruits Mines Study Area" by James P. Walsh 8 Associates, Inc., <br />in a report dated November 1, 1983. This report provides a good <br />starting point for identifying soil resources at this site. However, <br />i,t should be stressed that more intensive soil sampling <br />(e. g., Order 2 survey) similar to what is presented in the <br />November 15, 1983 report by Walsh R Associates would be required if any <br />additional lands would be disturbed (i. e., areas exceeding the already <br />addressed 6,700 acres in the November 15, 1983 report). _ <br />2. Footnote 2 for "Effective Rooting Depth" of the Chipeta silty clay loam <br />on Table 2.04.9-1 is missing. Please provide this footnote. <br />The following comments pertain to Table 2.04.9-8 "Depth of Suitable <br />Topsoil Material by Map Unit". <br />A. The "Recommended Depth of Maximum Salvage" for Bankard LS is <br />24 inches ("). However, the information presented in Table <br />2.04.9-7 "Evaluation of Soil Stability for Reclamation by Typical <br />Soil Pedon" would lend support to a greater soil depth to salvage. <br />Table 2.04.9-7 depicts a salvageable depth for Bankard Pedon 15 <br />of 60"; whereas, the salvageable depth for Youngston Pedon 19 is <br />listed at 24". The limiting factor for not going deeper than 24" <br />in the Youngston soils is due to an "unsuitable" electrical <br />conductivity (EC). A review of the data presented in the appendix <br />specifies an EC of 14.2 mmhos/cm for 24"-41" depth of Youngston, <br />which is within the "Poor" category of Table 2.04.9-6 "Criteria for <br />Topsoil Suitability". Due to the extremely limited amount of <br />topsoil medium at this site, the applicant should consider <br />increasing the salvageable depth to 41" for the following reasons. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.