APPCOR10077 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-- -- DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RES+OURC ES' ~M v III III III III IIII III 999 D. Moue Pascoe, Ezecu t~ve Director ~ ' AI1N~:U LAND RH:l:LA11iATluN ' ~~ `, 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel.)30~) 839-3567 David C. Shelton Director July 23, 1981 TO: Brian Munson FROM: Susan Mowry ,~i i)~ 10~~ SUBJECT: Munger Mine, Review of Responses Sections reviewed: 2.03.6, 2.03.10, 2.04.3, 2.04.4, 2.04.5, 2.09.6, 2.09.7 (2), 2.04.8, 2.04:11, 2.05.9, 2.05.6(1) and 2.05.6(2). 1. The applicant again failed to put a narrative on condition, capability, 'and productivity in the land use section as you requested. Instead, they reference the soils and vegetation sections. 2. It seems to me that no specific action was required by your comment on section 2.04.5. 3. ldhy did you ask for such extensive coal data? Sulfer forms in general i.s all I asked for. They contend that you did not mean coal but overburden. Is this correct? 4. A consultant's report on preventing sloughing on the steeper road portions will be forthcoming. Is this all the information you wanted? S. They did not include the original wind rose or its period of record. Some clarification of wind data has been added. 6. The new timetable on reclamation submitted is rather weak. No back filling schedule accompanies it. Check this out (2.05.4 No. 2). 7. Figure 3.1-1 does not show cross-sections as they state in response to 2.05.4 No. 4. Perhaps they mean 2.2-7. 8. 2.05.9 No. 8 does not seem to specifically require any action right now but you will need to keep this comment in mind when you review the hydrology. 9. They do not list a C-11, 725 (FD) emissions permit in Appendix E, let alone a copy of~it. They do list other emission permits and have copies of applications for amendments to those permits but nothing with the Z.D. number you specified in 2.05.6(1) No .. 1. ~~ mab