Laserfiche WebLink
e <br />,.. <br />iYaae 4i <br />M1NFS lU 3F V2C YItGJLUCTi:?~. Tn M bl.I QHJ-1147 <br />INSP$CTZON DATB 09/27/04 <br />iNSYr:i:'FiIK'a' iiviT.iiwi=C <br />The fcl~or!ing problems (PB) anti%u"t possible IiQTaYirlnR (VVi (a4u atayyao t.: C. CCr"err itiro <br />actions) !•~°re identified during this inspection. 'Lhe probieros s;:ould bs terrected by the <br />dates given, or they will become possible violations. Tue pvaoible -ric'_ationG should be <br />corrected by the dates given to reduce their severity wizen cc,-sidered by the Mined Land <br />neclametion aoard. The inspector noted on the previous page c::culd be notified of all <br />cerrerrive actions taken. <br />PROSL8N5 / PO S S I B i.3 _V TGI+aT TCh'S <br />AND <br />CORRSCTZVL' AGTIGSa <br />DATE <br />PROBLEM: <br />The permit boundary marn.ers i.-.c tz'_led by the operator do not PB or PV :PB <br />reflect the appxuve pewit area of 3 acres in size. .. .. TOPIC (S):MP <br />--' ~ "- ~ 11/30/04 <br />CUlil"2EC2`lYr: AC"++IGid: <br />amend the 110(2) pcrmxt crpl_^at!on ro properly reflect the <br />permit area cf 3.8 scree. n_,rrentlyr the markers delineate the <br />permit area tc be 2.°. acres rather than the approved 3.0 acres. <br />Sut:il a[r~ndr..ert cn:ct be reCaived by the Division on or before <br />riaVeCiiGOY 3C, 2C0~. <br />FiwSLEEL• PB or PV:PB <br />T:,a reclar.:aticn elan does not address reclamation of the TOPIC{S):SF <br />nairtensnce building. 11/30/04 <br />CO°.P.ECTIV*s ACTION: <br />address the reclamation of the maintenance building in L'ue <br />=meadment. apalication so that the Divisioa can calculate a cost <br />to remove the structure. If the building is to remain as a <br />component of the poatmining land use, then approval must be <br />dorvmented by the local land use authority by ivovenl;ar 20, 200?. <br />PROBLEM: <br />The minin4 and reclamation plan does not auiiress the waste pile PA or PV:PS <br />created by the operator. TOPIC(S):PW <br />11/30/04 <br />CORRBCTIVB ACTION: <br />Address 'the creation and reclamation o.` tha xaste pile noted on <br />site. Zf the pile is to remain in place, the ererz*_or will need to <br />address reclamation of the cut slope in the charnel to ultimately <br />achieve a 3h av slope. If this issue is not addressed bv_ the <br />operator, then the 1ivision SSill r vise the reclamation cost <br />estimate to move the kiie back to the cut slopes to achieve a 3h:iv <br />slope as so noteu in the reclamation plan. This should be <br />submitted with item (.i noted abase. <br />PRUBLliM <br />n <br />The operator is utilizing :scaler in the creek for the mining nTr! >- <br />operation, but has not subr:i*_ted the appropriate documentation TG" " S~ xs <br />LO the D't v:ioiOn. 11/30/04 <br />CGFti<SCTIVE ."~.CTTM4?: <br />Dca,crstratc thzt the operator is in compliance with the permit <br />and applicable Colorado Water Laws regarding the use and <br />exposure of taar_er in the Cashe Creek by November 30, 2uo4. <br />'ti1~194 'O <br />IusP <br />