Laserfiche WebLink
~ iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />Received <br />JUL 1 61998 <br />Durango Fiekf O <br />D~'lepn of Minerals g ftlcg <br />Geology <br />Merial I. Currier <br />PO Box 27059 <br />Denver, CO 80227 <br />July 13, 1999 <br />Bob Oswald <br />Division ofMinerals and Geology <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />Durango Field Office - - <br />484 Turner Drive, Bldg. F, Suite 101 <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />RE: Currier Gravel Pit, Permit #M-80-203 <br />Dear Mr. Oswald; <br />PV 8~ CEF ~FF~CE <br />SITE ~'1?~=oC~pY <br />RECEIVED <br />.iUi. 19 1999 <br />;r!is'~on of Minerals 6 Geology' <br />d- <br />I am working on final map revisions and will have a completed product for you soon. <br />I wish to clarify one item that has come up regazding the legal description. The legal <br />description on the original application was a mistake. The legal description on the <br />current surveyed map is correct. My father picked the original coordinates by reference <br />to a USGS map. He used the legal description that he thought corresponded with the pit <br />location. The pit location was not actually surveyed back in 1981 when he obtained the <br />permit. In the process of locating the corners by survey and drawing current maps the <br />correct legal description has now been determined. <br />The pit is actually in an adjoining 40-acre tract to the one described in the original <br />application. I hope this helps explain the difference between the two descriptions. <br />Sincerely, <br />f~ <br />Menal I. CurrierC~~ <br />