My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC31271
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC31271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:34:10 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:31:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
9/29/1983
Doc Name
NOV 83-25 AT GRAND MESA COAL CO RED CANYON MINE
From
WESTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORP
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Western <br />Mr. Brian E. Munson <br />Sr. Reclaration Specialist <br />Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Div. <br />423 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO. 80203 <br />III III III IIIIIII III <br />999 <br />September 28, 1983 <br />e~~'~~.~~~~ <br /> <br />Western Associ area Coal Corp. <br />Suite 2300 <br />410 Seventeenth Street <br />Denver, Coioratlo 80202 <br />(303) 625-1966 <br />SEP :;Q 198j <br />~,~~- <br />MINED Lif19 RECLr','dAT!71 ^"~'r~~~:l <br />Colo. Cert. of ta3:er21 Rcsourc°_ <br />RE: Notice of Violation #83-25 at Grand Mesa Coal Company's <br />Red Canyon Mine <br />Dear Mr. Munson: <br />Grand Mesa Coal Company wishes to accept the civil penalty <br />in the amount of $300.00 which has been assessed against violation <br />83-25. I believe the correspondence, both from your office and <br />from Grand Mesa Coal, records the facts accurately. <br />I believe that Grand Mesa should receive good faith <br />consideration, in that a one-week extension was requested during <br />the July 13th and July 15th inspections. As the facts record, <br />we had attempted to solve this problem by the dates required on <br />the previous inspections, and had found that we had the wrong <br />piece of equipment. We had rescheduled another piece of equipment <br />to do the job. It should be noted that in the past we have had <br />working cooperation to allow such repairs to be made at reasonable <br />times. Yo~~r consideration of this factor will be appreciated. <br />Very truly yours, <br />~Js.~--, ~ 1-. w~~ <br />William S. Tate <br />WST:KES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.