My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSPEC30317
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Inspection
>
INSPEC30317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 9:33:25 PM
Creation date
11/18/2007 10:25:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
1/11/2006
Doc Name
Inspection Letter
From
DMG
To
The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co.
Inspection Date
1/5/2006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St, Room 275 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 8663567 <br />FAX: (3031 832.8706 <br />January t 1, 2006 <br />Mr. Steven E. Leach <br />The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co. <br />4601 DTC Blvd. <br />Denver, CO 80237 <br />Re: 5 January 2006 Division Inspection Report <br />Dear Mr. Leach: <br />~LORADO <br />VISION O F <br />IN 6RALS <br />EOLOGY <br />SA FETT•ECIENCE <br />sal Osvens <br />Governor <br />Russell George <br />Ezecu[ive Director <br />Ronald W, canary <br />Division Director <br />NaN21 Resource Trustee <br />A storage shed had been set within or neaz the permit boundary on the North Haul Road (see the picture <br />in the inspection report). [f this structure is in support of the permit reclamation effort, and it is within the <br />permit boundary, it needs to be included in the list of facilities and the cost of its removal included in the <br />reclamation estimate. If this structure is in support of the permit reclamation effort, and it outside the <br />permit boundary, it presents a possible violation (in such case, the boundary needs to be revised, and the <br />structure needs to be included in the list of facilities, and the cost of its removal included in the <br />reclamation estimate). If it is a private structure on private land, within the permit area, not in support of <br />the reclamation effort, it should be so indicated in permit documentation. If it is a private structure, on <br />private land, not within the boundary of the permit, not in support of the reclamation effort, but within <br />1,000 feet of the permit boundary, it needs to be included on the azea map and its use identified [see Rule <br />2.10.3(1)(d)]. Please let me know of the status of this storage shed. <br />A number of documents were not located on file at the Routt County Court House (see the DMG <br />Available Records check sheet of the inspection). <br />The file of revision approvals (at the Court House) might be transferred to a binder, to be placed along <br />with the other binders of the Permit Application Package. This would free up space in the box where the <br />records listed on the DMG Available Records check sheet are kept. <br />Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. <br />Yours truly, <br />-fi~.c~~a-- /f Lc.~.z e2 /Z--~. <br />Byro~G. Walker, EPS <br />files: C-1980-001lnspections <br />C:\bgw\My Documents\Edna\InspectionslDivision\06 01 inspection comments lettecdoc <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.