INSPEC15118 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii 999 N 9 ~ a •y1ReH ~8~0 United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING Reclamation and Enforcement Suite 1200 505 Marquette Avenue N.W. Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 June 21, 1993 TAKE~~ ~ i1MERICA~ eli li li ~ M REPLY REFER TO: RE~~r~~~ JUN 2 ~ 1993 Division Di h(inE~; s Ueulvgy, Permit: C-82-055 Mine Name: Raton Creek Mr. Steve Renner, Coal Program Supervisor Division of Minerals and Geology Department of Natural Resources 215 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Dear Mr. Renner: The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) inspection report identifies a violation that is considered to have existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had not been cited. Date of Federal Inspection: 6/10/93 Date of LSCI: 1/12/93 The determination that the State did not cite the violation is based on one or more of the following reasons: The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no State enforcement action was taken. Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection (sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last State complete inspection have not been established (diversion ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, etc.). X Site conditions indicate that the violation noted had been in existence at the time o£, or prior to, the last State complete inspection. Failure to pass. Other (give explanation). Although the violation was cited by the State, OSM believes that the violation was evident during the last State complete inspection.