Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICF.OFSURFACE MINING <br />Ralamuion and Enfon:emrn[ <br />Suitt 1200 <br />505 A1aryuenc Aven uc N.W. <br />Albuquerque, New M«ico 87102 <br />December 7, 1994 <br />RECEIVED <br />DEC 0 9 1994 <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />Permit: C-81-023 <br />Mine Name: Chimney Rock <br />CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT: #P 079 749 3e6 <br />Mr. Michael B. Long, Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Long: <br />The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) <br />inspection report identifies violations that were considered to have <br />existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had <br />not been cited. <br />Date of Federal Inspection: 11/29/94 Date of LSCI: 7/12/94 <br />The determination that the State did not cite the violation is based on <br />one or more of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last <br />State complete inspection have not been established (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). <br />_X Site conditions indicate that the violation(s) noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete <br />inspection. <br />Other: (give explanation). <br />Although the violations were cited by the State, or were abated during a <br />joint inspection, OSM believes that the violations were evident during <br />the last State complete inspection. <br />