Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />PO BOX 18087, BOULDER, CO 80308 <br /> ph 303-443-9521 <br />Environmental & EngineeringWeiland, Inc.W I <br />7/22/2022 <br /> <br /> <br />Brock Bowles <br />Environmental protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Mining Reclamation & Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br /> <br /> <br />Re: Technical Revision, Goose Haven Reservoir M-2010-071 <br />Brock, <br />I have copied your comments from the Adequacy Review 1 letter dated November 30, 2021 below <br />followed by my responses in italics. <br />Rule 1.6.2(1)(d) and 1.6.5(2) – Proof of Publication <br />1. Please submit proof of publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of <br />the proposed operation. <br />I have enclosed my email correspondence and invoice payment to the Dailey Camera <br />as Attachment I -Proof of Publication in Local Newspaper <br />Rule 1.6.2.(e) Notice of Land Owners – <br />2. Please submit proof of notice to owners of record for all land surface within 200 feet of <br />the boundary of the affected land. <br />Proof of Notice to owners of Record within 200ft is also included in Attachment II – <br />Proof of Mailing to Surface Owners Within 200ft <br />Rule 6.2.1(2) Maps and Exhibits – <br />3. The text states that Exhibit C-2 Mining Plan Map has been changed to add Sheet 3. <br />Sheet 3 was not submitted with the application. Please submit Exhibit C-2, Sheet 3 for <br />review. <br />The text erroneously referred to Exhibit C-2 Sheets 1,2 & 3, however the mine plan <br />maps were labeled Exhibit D Mine Plan Map, Sheets 1, 2, 3 and all of which were <br />submitted with the AM-2 application. The text in Exhibit D has been corrected. <br />Rule 6.4 - Specific Exhibit Requirements - 112 Reclamation Operation <br />6.4.1 EXHIBIT A - Legal Description - Adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.2 EXHIBIT B - Index Map - Adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.3 EXHIBIT C - Pre-mining & Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />4. See #3 above.See response to #3 above also.