My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-02-05_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2019-02-05_REVISION - M1980244 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2019 3:02:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2019 9:41:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/5/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR104
Email Name
TC1
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEWMONT cEIVED Newnnont Mining Corporation <br /> Cnpple C,eet.&Victor Mine <br /> 1St <br /> FEB 0 5 2019 P 00 o. <br /> Victor. Co 80860 <br /> DIVISION OF�C�,MA7�DN www nevmont corn <br /> MINING AND SAFE <br /> SENT CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br /> 7018 0680 0000 4627 5583 <br /> January 31, 2019 <br /> Mr. Timothy Cazier, P.E. <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> Re: Permit No. M-1980-244; Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company; Cresson <br /> Project; TR 104 — Mineralized Waste Processing Preliminary Adequacy Review <br /> Response <br /> Dear Mr. Cazier: <br /> On October 10, 2018 Newmont Mining Corporation's Cripple Creek and Victor Gold Mining <br /> Company (CC&V) received the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's (DRMS's) <br /> preliminary adequacy review of Technical Revision (TR)No.104. Below are DRMS's comments <br /> in italics followed by CCV's response in bold. <br /> 1. Figure 1: The provided map covers only slightly more than half of an 8 1/2 x 11 sheet of <br /> paper, has red text that is difficult to read and has no scale. Please provide a revised map <br /> meeting the requirements of Rule 6.2.1(2)(e) and C.R.S. 34-32-112(4)(d) to include: an <br /> acceptable map scale not larger than 1 inch = 50 feet nor smaller than 1 inch = 660 feet. <br /> Also, that a map scale, appropriate legend, map title, date and a north arrow (the <br /> Division notes that the map provided did have a north arrow)shall be included. <br /> Figure 1 has been updated as required and is enclosed in this submission. Please <br /> note that labels have been added to each area and the Altman shape has been <br /> altered from the original figure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.