My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-01-04_REVISION - M1994117 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1994117
>
2019-01-04_REVISION - M1994117 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2025 2:27:52 AM
Creation date
1/4/2019 4:14:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1994117
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/4/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Colorado Milling Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO MILLING COMPANY, LLC <br /> P.O. Box 1523 <br /> Longmont, Colorado 80502 /! pwsr 001 <br /> Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety Janu <br /> Amy Eschberger <br /> Environmental Protection Specialist <br /> 1313 Sherman Street—Room 215 RECEIVED <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> JAN U <br /> RE: Gold Hill Mill, Permit No. M-1994-117,Amendment Application DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, <br /> (Revision No. AM-01), Adequacy Review No. 2 MINING AND SAFETY <br /> ATTN: Amy Eschberger <br /> This is the Colorado Milling Company, LLC's Response Letter to the Amy Eschberger's <br /> December 21,2018 Adequacy Review No. 2 of the Application for an Amendment to the Gold <br /> Hill Mill Limited Impact 110 (2) Permit No. M-1994-117, to formally add the previously <br /> permitted Left Hand Creek Pump Station, Gold Hill Mill Pipeline, and the Times Mine adit <br /> portal to the affected land boundary of the Gold Hill Mill Permit. These three features are <br /> collectively referred to as the Gold Hill Mill Waterline in this Response Letter. In order to ensure <br /> that the responses to the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety's request for additional <br /> information and clarification can be properly reviewed, the responses are set out below each of <br /> Amy Eschberger's Adequacy Review comments. <br /> Application Form: <br /> 1) The revised page 3 of the application form includes the following coordinates for the primary <br /> mine entrance location: 40°03' 55.74"N, 105'24' 24.12.1"W. The seconds given for the <br /> longitude is not accurate. Based on the coordinates provided on the revised location map,the <br /> Division believes the longitude should read: 105'24' 12.1"W. Please correct this error on <br /> page 3. <br /> CMC Response: This has been corrected. <br /> Exhibit B—Site Description (Rule 6.3.2): <br /> 2) The operator's response to item no. 9 states the only structures located within 200 feet of the <br /> entire affected area are three small wooden frame structures, a single family residence, several <br /> sheds, and an unused corral. However, in Exhibit L,the operator states there is a pole-mounted <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.