My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-01-29_REVISION - M1977219
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977219
>
2018-01-29_REVISION - M1977219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2021 3:07:15 PM
Creation date
1/31/2018 11:13:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977219
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/29/2018
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #4
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Epvi*roipMejpt, lG. <br />LARRY E. O'BRIAN7985 VANCE DRIVE, SUITE 205A <br />FOUNDER RECEIVED ARVADA, COLORADO 80003 <br />STEVAN L O'BRIAN303-423-7297 <br />PRESIDENT JAN 2 '018 FAX 303-423-7599 <br />January 29, 2 018 DQE OF RECLAMATION <br />93MANDSAFETY <br />Mr. Elliot Russell <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St, Suite 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear El 1 i.ot <br />Re: Summit Brick and Tile Company - Fox No 1 Clay Pit <br />Permit # M-1977-219 - Adequacy Response #4 <br />On behalf of our client Summit Brick and Tile Company, I will <br />respond to your fourth adequacy review letter dated January 25, <br />2018 in the order and number format presented in that document. I <br />have added each point to be addressed from your letter so when <br />reviewing our response one does not have to keep referring back to <br />your adequacy letter. <br />EXHIBIT D - Mining Plan (Rule 6.4.4): <br />60. In response to Adequacy Item #55, the Applicant provided a revised and updated Blasting <br />Plan in accordance with Rule 6.4.4(1) and Rule 6.5(4). The Division has reviewed the new <br />submittal and provides the following inadequacies: <br />60.1 In response to Adequacy Item #55.3, the Applicant states a one -mile setback line <br />around the permit was used to determine structures which qualify for a pre -blast <br />survey. The Division believes this is in error as other sections of the blasting plan <br />state the distance being one-half mile. Please revise this accordingly and <br />re -submit a new page 2 of the Adequacy Response 43. <br />This was a typographical error, I fixed it and will replace it in <br />the county submittal copy. A replacement page is attached for <br />the file. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.