Laserfiche WebLink
City of Greeley v- Boyd Irrigation Company <br /> Water and Sewer Department 1100 10th Street, Suite 300 <br /> 1100 1 Oth Street, Suite 300 Greeley, CO 80631 <br /> Greeley, CO 80631 <br /> RECEIVE® <br /> June 21, 2017 /JUL U b 2017 <br /> DIVISION OF RECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> Tony Waldron <br /> Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety <br /> Director, Minerals Regulatory Program <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 ac-,rrtf <br /> Re: Permit File No. M-1992-069, 83rd Joint Venture <br /> Dear Mr. Waldron: <br /> On April 6, 2017, representatives from the City of Greeley ("City") and the Boyd <br /> Irrigation Company ("BIC") met with you, Wally Erickson, Peter Hays, Tim Cazier, and <br /> Scott Shultz. We discussed the now quite familiar background of the erosion damage <br /> caused to our respective properties (the City's F Street agricultural property and BIC's <br /> ditch) by the operations of Aggregate Industries—WCR, Inc. ("Al") under your permit file <br /> no. M-1992-069 at its 83rd Joint Venture sand and gravel pit. <br /> At the conclusion of that meeting, you said that the Division would require Al to protect <br /> against erosion and repair damage caused by erosion at that pit and that the Division <br /> will be sending Al a "statement of problem." Instead, on June 1, 2017, in response to a <br /> request for a status update from Christie Coleman, Peter Hays wrote: "Regarding the <br /> status of the 83rd Joint Venture site, please see the email and attachment below from <br /> Connie Davis with Aggregate Industries." Unsurprisingly, the referenced letter was a <br /> continuation of Al's strategy of clouding the issue of its legal obligations under the <br /> above-referenced permit with discussion of a lease of water completely unrelated to the <br /> damage that Al has caused the City and BIC. The City has refused to enter this <br /> discretionary transaction with Al and will not change that decision. Yet, Mr. Hays seems <br /> to consider that by forwarding to us a letter that was actually addressed to us, the <br /> Division has dealt with this matter. <br /> In case the responsibilities of the Division have been overlooked, we call your attention <br /> again to Sections 34-32.5-116(4)(i) and (j) and 34-32.5-123(2) of the Colorado Revised <br /> Statutes as well as Sections 3.3.1(2) and 3.3.2(2)(b) of the Rules and Regulations of the <br /> Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for the Extraction of Construction Materials. <br /> Those statutes and regulations provide in part that "all surface areas of the affected <br />