Laserfiche WebLink
5/17/2017 <br />Statmco.us Executive Branch Mail Re: approaching Decision Dates <br />| have updated the decision date forRoidel (C1982056) TR'87to5/26/2017. Please copy Dan Hernandez on <br />correspondence for this revision between 5/19and 8/1 ou|will beout ofthe office. <br />Thank you <br />OnTua. May 16. 2017at8:03AM, Nettleton, Jany <JNett|eton@peabodyenerg\ccom> wrote: <br />Tabetha — <br />For TR17-87, I believe that the adequacy responses that Miranda sent on 05/05 addressed the issues you had <br />identified as Technical Adequacy items, so the only issue outstanding is the clarification by the SHPO, as requested <br />would respond at that time. I have not received a response, have you?? Given this, we request that the decision <br />date for TR17-87 be extended to 05/26, and I will send a follow-up email or call Robert. I know that you will be <br />gone, but we would like to get the approval on this before you get back so we can get the pipeline buried. <br />For the Sage Creek RN01, the adequacy review included some items related to the PHC and selenium, and as you <br />may be aware, we are challenging both the civil penalty on the selenium NOV and the CPDES Permit, so this is an <br />issue that is currently in flux. I've talked with Dan about it, and for now we are prioritizing the Yoast Renewal, an <br />will then move on to Sage Creek. Given these considerations, we request that the RN01 decision date be extend <br />to 07/31/17. 1 <br />We appreciate your patience and consideration. If you have questions, or we need to discuss, please feel free to <br />contact me— <br />WRIZEME F4 ms <br />hups:llnai|.googe.00m/maiVb/n 1/u0/?u~2&ix=dobnDodu0&vew~pt&uoamh~inbox&m~1no1u0d8 8nO8fd&nim|~1no120dO 0nOOfd 1/2 <br />