Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO <br />r Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />March 24, 2017 <br />Andy Rodriguez <br />Civil Resources LLC <br />PO Box 680 <br />Frederick CO 80530 <br />Re: North LaPoudre Pit, Permit M2000-144, Receipt of Incomplete 112 Construction Materials <br />Reclamation Permit Amendment Application Package <br />Mr. Rodriguez: <br />On March 20, 2017, the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety received the 112 Construction Materials <br />Reclamation Permit Application package for the North LaPoudre Pit (M2000-144). Preliminary review of the <br />information received determined that the following items must be received before the Division can consider your <br />application as being filed and technical review can begin: <br />APPLICATION FORM: <br />Lines 1.1 and 5.2 were left blank, and the "Applicanvoperator or company name" given on line I does not match <br />that used on the signature page (page 8). <br />EXHIBITS: <br />Exhibits Q, and R are missing from the submittal, <br />Exhibit S is incomplete as no proof has been provided that damage waiver agreements were provided to any of the <br />listed structure owners within 200 feet of the permit as required by Rule 6.4.19(a). <br />DRMS is required to process amendments to existing applications in accordance with Rule 1.10.1(4) which states <br />that "Applications for amendments shall be reviewed by the Board or Office in the same manner as applications for <br />new Permits." <br />Rule 1. 10.1(1) also states that "Where applicable, there shall be fled with any application for a 112 Reclamation <br />Permit amendment, attachment(s) map(s) and one (1) original and four (4) copies of the application with the same <br />content as required for an original application, except that the Applicant will not be required to submit any <br />information which duplicates applicable previous submittals. However, the Applicant shall clearly describe where in <br />the original application and supporting documents the information not included in the amendment application, but <br />necessary to render the amendment technically adequate, may be found. Generally speaking, with a 17 -year-old <br />permit such as this, a newirevised set of all required exhibits, especially maps, will be the easiest way to provide <br />sufficient information to DRMS. DRMS will require sufficient information to review the whole of the proposed <br />permit area before this amendment can be approved. <br />Bestway Concrete will also be required to submit a new performance warranty for this amendment to be considered <br />complete for filing, <br />or coca <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us ye <br />John W. Hickentooper, Governor I Robert W. Randall, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director I <br />{187b� <br />