Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />HISTORY <br />March 22, 2016 <br />Tabetha N. Lynch <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RECEIVE® <br />MAR 2 9 2016 <br />1 5AFEW <br />Re: "Trapper Mine (Permit No, C-1981-010), Technical Revision No. 115 (TR -115), POhIT and Mine <br />Plan Updates Including Selected 2015 Midterm Review (HC #67393) <br />Dear Ms. Lynch: <br />We received your correspondence dated March 3, 2016 on March 9, 2016 and a copy of the project <br />area map showing the proposed disturbance expansion area on March 21, 2016 as requested by our <br />March 18, 2016 email. <br />While we have no comment regarding the post -mining topography changes proposed for the K Strike <br />pit, we offer three comments for the 49.7 -acre disturbance area. First, it appears that the expansion is <br />located within Section 5, Township 5N, Range 90W of the 6th Principal Meridian, yet the permit area <br />(as per your letter) does not include this section. We request clarification regarding this apparent <br />discrepancy. Second, while there are no known historic properties located directly within the proposed <br />disturbance (expansion) area, the Recurve Rockshelter (5MF948)—determined eligible for listing to the <br />National Register of Historic Places in august 1982—is located nearby, specifically on the south -side <br />of the landform slated for mining. As Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires <br />that the agency consider direct, indirect and cumulative effects that may result from its undertaking, we <br />request that you provide supplemental information regarding potential indirect and cumulative effects <br />associated with ongoing and proposed coal miring on this site. "Third, we are unable to determine <br />whether prior historic property identification has occurred within the 49.7 -acre area proposed for <br />disturbance. We request additional information regarding prior survey within this area. If this area has <br />not been surveyed for historic properties in accordance with currently acceptable methodological <br />standards, we recommend that DRMS complete supplemental identification within the 49.7 -acre <br />expansion area. This comment may apply to other areas of the proposed Trapper Mine where historic <br />property identification has not occurred and we request that you evaluate the adequacy of this survey. <br />We request being involved in the consultation process with the local government, which as stipulated <br />in 36 CFR 800.3 is required to be notified of the undertaking, and with other consulting parties. <br />Additional information provided by the local government or consulting parties might cause our office <br />to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings. Please note that our compliance letter does <br />not end the 30 -day review period provided to other consulting parties. <br />