Laserfiche WebLink
Mineral Mountain 110 Permit Boundary Issues <br /> At issue is the possibility of two parcels of BLM managed public land within the permit boundary. The two parcels in <br /> question have been designated as the "South Area" and the "North Area inside Permit Area" by Mr.Art Braun, PE, Braun <br /> Environmental, Inc., in an e-mail to Stephanie Carter, BLM Royal Gorge Field Office Geologist, dated May 11, 2015. In <br /> the e-mail, Mr. Braun is of the opinion that the two parcels are not BLM public land, but are part of privately owned <br /> patented mining claims. Based on a review of Mineral Survey Plats and Field Notes, and Patent documents, it is my <br /> opinion that the two parcels are still un-patented public land managed by the BLM. RECEIVED <br /> "South Area" JUN 25 2015 <br /> [A]SION Of RECLAMATION <br /> This parcel of land is a 0.23 acre area within the original surveyed boundaries of the Little Hope`oodeN� 'was excluded <br /> from the patent of the Little Hope lode, and by record area conflicts with the Colburn lode, was not included in the <br /> patent of the Colburn lode. <br /> The Little Hope lode was located in 1891 and originally survey in 1894 as Mineral Survey No. 8731, containing an area of <br /> 9.901 acres. In 1895, a 0.23 acre portion of ground was relinquished from the Little Hope lode, thus reducing the area to <br /> 9.671 acres. On July 11, 1895, the Little Hope lode was patented under GLO Document No. 25842, containing 9.67 <br /> acres, which exclude the 0.23 acre parcel from the patent. <br /> a <br /> I� <br /> r <br /> i <br /> d xrrac:aarsr��,t!nw�... � 1 <br /> i <br /> hr <br /> f <> <br /> d �, tj l.,,.,.rrc._�, ;,•<. . r ,. •F,+ r t� e . ,;;x, ,-a��"coa ,f, t?tzxrtr.�P:fi° t'• t".r✓'r:;� .-- . <br /> . , . ``,r 7 <br /> !I.fU � f/ /Jr F1 1'. (>'r,P i�,'L"' .xFG3',"�'.'.� d° rn'.�a�rS�t f? i(','tJ ��r-.,,2'f}'F�.!`ae,..�. <br />