2015-12-21_REVISION - C1982056

• Permit No: C1982056
• IBM Index Class Name: Revision
• Doc Date: 12/21/2015
• Doc Name: Email Regarding Completeness Review
• From: DRMS
• To: Twentymile Coal, LLC
• Type & Sequence: MR291
• Email Name: JLE
• Email Name: DIH
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

12/22/2015 State.co.us Executive Branch Mail -Re: Twentymile Coal, LLC- Foidel Creek Mine -MR 15-291 13 -Left OUtby Utility Borehole Completeness Response
STATE, OF Hernandez - DNR Alysha <[e-mail]>
COLORADO '
Re: Twentymile Coal, LLC - Foidel Creek Mine - MR15-291 13 -Left OUtby Utility
Borehole Completeness Response
1 message
Ebert - DNR, Jared <[e-mail]> Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM
To: "Nettleton, Jerry" <JNettleton @peabodyenergy. com>
Cc: Alysha Hernandez - DNR <[e-mail]>
Jerry,
have not received the hard copy of your completeness review response with the necessary map, thus I have
not deemed the application complete. However, in order to expedite the process I have reviewed all of the
application material that I have received. Below are items that will need to be addressed prior to approval of the
MR291 application.
1. TC revised permit pages 2.04-9.1 and 9.2 with MR292. MR292 added a new section specifically for the
13LT Outby Utility Borehole cultural resource survey. The originally proposed revised pages submitted with
MR291 did not take MR292 into account. Page 2.04-9.1 no longer needs to be revised, but page 2.04-9.2 needs
to be revised to add a discussion about the results of the cultural resource survey that was conducted under the
new section created for this project with MR292.
2. Proposed revised pages 2.05-45.29 and 2.05-84.13, indicates a maximum of 1.0 feet of soil material from
the road and pad disturbed area will be recovered and stockpiled. Based on Map 17 of the permit, the new
proposed road falls within a portion of soils unit 50E and D10 and the pad area falls within soil unit D10. The
average soil thickness for soils unit D10 and 50E is 30 inches and 18 inches respectively. Given this, the soils
recovery plan does not appear to be adequate. Please revise the soils recovery and storage plan to salvage all
available topsoil. Please revise the above referenced pages accordingly. Also, please update Table 49A with
the revised estimate of topsoil to be salvaged.
3. The first paragraph of proposed revised page 2.05-106.1 does not follow with the paragraph from the
previous page. Please revise these pages for consistency.
Once I get the hard copy of your response, I will deem the application complete. Please let me know if you
have any questions.
Thanks,
Jared
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Nettleton, Jerry <[e-mail]> wrote:
Jared -
Attached is the response package (less maps) for the above -referenced MR. The hard -copy with maps will be
mailed -out today for your files.
Given the delays associated with obtaining the required cultural resource survey, we are very tight on our
schedule to get this work completed in order to meet our operational requirements. Therefore, any help you
can provide in expediting final review and approval will be greatly appreciated. If there are any additional
items that you identify in your final review, please let me know right away so we can respond immediately.
We appreciate your consideration and cooperation. If I don't talk with you between now and Christmas - Have
a wonderful and blessed holiday with family and friends -
https://mail.googl e.com/m ai I/u/0/?ui=2&i k=e29129fcb5&view=pt&search= i nbox&th=151 e6d5d32b6ec0d&si m l=151 c6d5d32b6ecOd 1/2